GTA Five

GTA 4 had a shite story. Bunch of immigrants I couldn't understand acting as errand boys. Technically it was fantastic, enjoyment wise it sucked.

Mc Babel wrote:GTA 4 had a shite story. Bunch of immigrants I couldn't understand acting as errand boys. Technically it was fantastic, enjoyment wise it sucked.

GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

Mc Babel wrote:GTA 4 had a shite story. Bunch of immigrants I couldn't understand acting as errand boys. Technically it was fantastic, enjoyment wise it sucked.

GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

With characters like Lil'Jacob no chance.



RDR story > Any GTA game.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

Lux wrote:Graphics are nice, but ALWAYS come behind gameplay. If the gameplay and story are not up to scratch, I'm not going to be content with how good it looks.

I agree with this, but the gameplay and storyline are fantastic.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

Mc Babel wrote:GTA 4 had a shite story. Bunch of immigrants I couldn't understand acting as errand boys. Technically it was fantastic, enjoyment wise it sucked.

GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

I enjoyed the birdseye GTA UK version more. You surely haven't played all the GTA games if you think that GTA IV has the best storyline.

Saving the QPR team bus from blowing up

Mc Babel wrote:

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:



GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

With characters like Lil'Jacob no chance.



RDR story > Any GTA game.

RDR is not a GTA game.



Little Jacob doesn't have much effect on the storyline. Why not mention a character like Ray, Pegorino, Niko, Roman, Dimitri who do have an impact on the story, not Litlle Jacob.

Lux wrote:

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

I agree with this, but the gameplay and storyline are fantastic.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:



GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

I enjoyed the birdseye GTA UK version more. You surely haven't played all the GTA games if you think that GTA IV has the best storyline.

I have only played GTA IV and GTA SA, but watched the other stories on Youube and they are average.

Pip, you've not even finished San Andreas and never even played Vice City (which probably was a genius game in itself). How can you even say that IV was better?


Or is this you sticking to this quirky, eccentric, "I'll go against the popular opinion" character you've created?

Dan wrote:Pip, you've not even finished San Andreas and never even played Vice City (which probably was a genius game in itself). How can you even say that IV was better?


Or is this you sticking to this quirky, eccentric, "I'll go against the popular opinion" character you've created?

Most probably tbis.

Dan wrote:Pip, you've not even finished San Andreas and never even played Vice City (which probably was a genius game in itself). How can you even say that IV was better?


Or is this you sticking to this quirky, eccentric, "I'll go against the popular opinion" character you've created?

I'm judging by the videos I have seen.

Dan wrote:

I respect your physical opinion.



When I first played GTA IV, I was blown away. I returned to play on San Andreas later that day and I just could not play it. I turned it off after 5 mnuites. and have only played it twice since.

I admit that the graphics were stunning in GTA IV(although a little too much grey in the colour scheme). But the gameplay and story was far too weak for me, didn't even feel like i was playing a GTA game most of the time.

GTA 3, Vice City and San Andreas are classic, pick up and play, arcade like games. GTA IV Wasn't that at all, it felt like more of a chore playing that game.

JMB_94 wrote:I admit that the graphics were stunning in GTA IV(although a little too much grey in the colour scheme). But the gameplay and story was far too weak for me, didn't even feel like i was playing a GTA game most of the time.

I am honestly dumbfounded at the opinions some of you have. I thought this of San Andreas, but it sems you all think that of GTA.

And it was a chore playing SA because the missions were shit. Even the later ones looked drab.

San Andreas graphics were far from 'stunning' Pip, but it was an insanely fun game to play.

JMB_94 wrote:San Andreas graphics were far from 'stunning' Pip, but it was an insanely fun game to play.

I agree with the first point, but a game can have shit graphics and be fun to play (Not implementing that SA had shit graphics) but the gameplay was boring, the storyline was weak, the characters sucked (Except for maybe Big Smoke), the map sucked. It was an average game.

GTA4 had a pretty shit and generic story but the graphics on it with this mod (PC) are fucking mind blowing.

GTA IV had an immense storyline.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:the map sucked

Now that takes the biscuit.

It was by far the best map.

You had several different kinds of cities, as well as amazing countryside and a desert too. GTA IV is basically one dull city.

Lux wrote:

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:the map sucked

Now that takes the biscuit.

It was by far the best map.

You had several different kinds of cities, as well as amazing countryside and a desert too. GTA IV is basically one dull city.

No, it as a derelict, drab city with a woodland and a desert. It sucked.

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

JMB_94 wrote:San Andreas graphics were far from 'stunning' Pip, but it was an insanely fun game to play.

I agree with the first point, but a game can have shit graphics and be fun to play (Not implementing that SA had shit graphics) but the gameplay was boring, the storyline was weak, the characters sucked (Except for maybe Big Smoke), the map sucked. It was an average game.

YOU DID LIKE 10 ACTUAL MISSIONS.

Play thr actual game properly before you start saying it was shit. It was far from it.

Dan wrote:

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:

I agree with the first point, but a game can have shit graphics and be fun to play (Not implementing that SA had shit graphics) but the gameplay was boring, the storyline was weak, the characters sucked (Except for maybe Big Smoke), the map sucked. It was an average game.

YOU DID LIKE 10 ACTUAL MISSIONS.

Play thr actual game properly before you start saying it was shit. It was far from it.

I watched the other missions aswell. I am glad I got stuck at that mission, judging some of those missions. Some of them are just plane ridiculous (I spelt it that way on purpose, becuase of Zero's missions).

Watching missions are completely different to playing them. And Zero's aren't even necessary to the story.

Dan wrote:Watching missions are completely different to playing them. And Zero's aren't even necessary to the story.

I know that. And I know that too. But I know if I watched a mission on GTA IV, it'd make me want to play that mission, wheras if I did that with SA, it wouldn't inspire me to play it.

GTAIV was drive from point a to point b, rinse and repeat.

Mc Babel wrote:GTAIV was drive from point a to point b, rinse and repeat.

Yeah, nearly as bad as that fucking 'Gran Turismo' game.

Mc Babel wrote:GTAIV was drive from point a to point b, rinse and repeat.

The missions had variety. Sure you drive and hoot in almost all of them, but someti9me you may ue a boat or a helicopter to shoot down your prey.

Mc Babel wrote:GTAIV was drive from point a to point b, rinse and repeat.

As are most GTA games

Mc Babel wrote:

Pippo Inzaghi wrote:



GTA IV has the best story out of any GTA game.

With characters like Lil'Jacob no chance.



RDR story > Any GTA game.

RDR's was brilliant.

GTA IV lacks a jetpack!



I ROFLED for ages the first time I was this baby in action