Not for the faint of heart
+2
Lux
ResurrectionRooney
6 posters
What the fuck is wrong with Russia?
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Guest- Guest
At least people stopped in this video. This just shows your claims of us doing the same thing as in the China video is false.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
How the fuck does it prove me wrong? I didn't see anyone rushing over to help, did you?
Guest- Guest
Are you fucking blind? I saw at least 4 people stop and get out of their cars after she was hit.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Yeah, to watch, that's covered in the bystander effect.
Guest- Guest
The clip only shows a few seconds after the accident. Just enough time for someone to get out of their car. You can even see on of them running probably to get help/call the police.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Why would they call the police when the police are already there? Idiot.
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
ahlycotc wrote:
Exactly
People aren't going to instantly rush out into traffic after someone was just run over. In the few seconds that the 1/2 people you could actually see in the camera didn't rush over instantly....they were probably in shock or something, it's not like they walked past like it never happened.
People stopped, and the police rushed over.
Doesn't prove your point at all RR.
Barton-
- Formerly known as : JMB_94
Posts : 10066
Age : 30
The thing is though, in the other clip a little girl was left there for minutes as bypassers ignored her. In this one you can clearly see a the police are already at the scene, so they don't need to get help.
Guest- Guest
You could also see drivers stop their car and get out to check on the pedestrian. I doubt those drivers saw the policeman standing over there.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
In fairness this video wasn't really intended to illustrate the point about the Bystander effect, more the retardation of a person to walk into a motorway with their kid.
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:In fairness this video wasn't really intended to illustrate the point about the Bystander effect, more the retardation of a person to walk into a motorway with their kid.
Yeah, I'm sure that's exactly why you posted this video.
Guest- Guest
The driver tried to stop and all the smoke went up from his tires and he slowed. Fell bad for everyone involved though.
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
ResurrectionRooney wrote:How the fuck does it prove me wrong? I didn't see anyone rushing over to help, did you?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Yeah, to watch, that's covered in the bystander effect.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:In fairness this video wasn't really intended to illustrate the point about the Bystander effect, more the retardation of a person to walk into a motorway with their kid.
Guest- Guest
RR's ego has blown out of proportion. He was proven wrong and then tries to act like he wasn't even talking about the bystander effect.
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
hahahahah omg what an idiot
Weather130-
- Posts : 4025
Age : 35
Location : Pittsburgh, PA
If this video was to prove the Chinese video it would have to be a bit longer to show what was going on. I do see some sort of reaction going on here, did this person die as well? Would be nice to have the full story here.
Guest- Guest
LOL @ RR proving himself wrong.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Yes, the two year old was obliterated. Note that I only brought China into it when Ahly dishonestly claimed that it proved me wrong in the other thread, which I don't think it does.
Guest- Guest
That's weak man.
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Yes, the two year old was obliterated. Note that I only brought China into it when Ahly dishonestly claimed that it proved me wrong in the other thread, which I don't think it does.
My God, your giant ego is as big as my cock. You clearly created this thread to illustrate the bystander affect. The video you posted does nothing to support your claims and in fact disproves it seeing as several bystanders stopped what they were doing and offered help. After being proven wrong, you attempt to diffuse the situation by claiming your intention of posting the video was to illustrate a stupid pedestrian.
You were simply proved wrong and your behavior is weak. Why can't you ever admit wrongdoing? We won't bite.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
WHY WOULD I POST A VIDEO THAT PROVES ME WRONG TO ILLUSTRATE MY POINT???
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:WHY WOULD I POST A VIDEO THAT PROVES ME WRONG TO ILLUSTRATE MY POINT???
BECAUSE YOU AREN'T THE BRIGHTEST!!!
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:WHY WOULD I POST A VIDEO THAT PROVES ME WRONG TO ILLUSTRATE MY POINT???
Ask yourself. Capitalizing your post doesn't make you look any more innocent.
Here is a question...why did you claim that the video was not used to illustrate the bystander effect and instead a stupid pedestrian after you were called out? If you were using it to illustrate the bystander effect and then lie about it, it's obvious you were proven wrong and wanted a way out to avoid embarrassment. Your shit's weak, son.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
You claimed it proved me wrong when it does nothing of the sort, it is normal that I would defend my point of view in such a circumstance.
If you start a thread about a goal scored by a player, and I say it disproves the Koran because he's not a Muslim and he scored, and you say 'No that's ridiculous', that doesn't mean you were posting the goal to prove the Koran is true, does it?
If you start a thread about a goal scored by a player, and I say it disproves the Koran because he's not a Muslim and he scored, and you say 'No that's ridiculous', that doesn't mean you were posting the goal to prove the Koran is true, does it?
Guest- Guest
You just sound stupider and stupider with every post, RR. I'll go down to your level and actually argue your ridiculous analogy (you always come up with such gems).
If I posted a video of a player scoring a goal, I would be posting it because it was a good goal or for any other reason. I wouldn't be posting it to prove the Quran is true or not.
You however, posted this video to prove the bystander effect. Your thread title and the tie to the discussion of the effect in the China thread suggest you were posting this video to prove the bystander effect. This became even clearer when I replied to it and you continued to mention the bystander effect. Once two or more members supported my view, you did a complete 180 and claimed it was to show how stupid the pedestrian was (what BS). And to my surprise, you go back on your words again and claim this is in fact about the bystander effect.
If I posted a video of a player scoring a goal, I would be posting it because it was a good goal or for any other reason. I wouldn't be posting it to prove the Quran is true or not.
You however, posted this video to prove the bystander effect. Your thread title and the tie to the discussion of the effect in the China thread suggest you were posting this video to prove the bystander effect. This became even clearer when I replied to it and you continued to mention the bystander effect. Once two or more members supported my view, you did a complete 180 and claimed it was to show how stupid the pedestrian was (what BS). And to my surprise, you go back on your words again and claim this is in fact about the bystander effect.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
You tied it to the Bystander effect by saying it disproved it, when it obviously didn't. Now you are trying to twist things to say I am using this to support the Bystander effect. There are many, many better examples and studies that I could use to support the Bystander Effect than this.
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:You tied it to the Bystander effect by saying it disproved it, when it obviously didn't. Now you are trying to twist things to say I am using this to support the Bystander effect. There are many, many better examples and studies that I could use to support the Bystander Effect than this.
And unfortunately you chose the shittiest video to prove your point. I took the bystander effect in psychology class in college. I know what it is. In the China thread you said we were all hypocrites for claiming we would have helped the child because of the bystander effect. Yet people have come forward of real life examples in which they did take action. This video also proves people taking action. I'm not arguing the bystander effect. I'm just showing you how that video does not prove the bystander effect (especially your claim that we are all hypocrites).
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
It was never intended to prove the Bystander effect. You and a few other people need to get over your obsession with attempting to prove me wrong.
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:How the fuck does it prove me wrong? I didn't see anyone rushing over to help, did you?
Notice how you don't say "this video was intended to show the pedestrian". No, you in fact talk about the bystander effect.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Yeah, to watch, that's covered in the bystander effect.
Again, mention of the bystander effect.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:In fairness this video wasn't really intended to illustrate the point about the Bystander effect, more the retardation of a person to walk into a motorway with their kid.
Oh what's this? Changing your mind now?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Yes, the two year old was obliterated. Note that I only brought China into it when Ahly dishonestly claimed that it proved me wrong in the other thread, which I don't think it does.
Here is the real gem. You say the video actually proves the bystander effect.
