FIFA 12

With the new gameplay stuff I can see people going 1nil up early and keep passing the ball around the back till the game is over

What is so important about overall ratings?

why aren't you guys more interested in the actual attributes - dribbling, passing, speed, acceleration, etc. ?

do overall ratings even have an impact in-game and how are they even calculated?

Evra 85

Piss off Jamie

You know it's laughable too.

Can't believe how much you Liverpool fans over-rate Suarez. OK he's had a good few months of form, but that doesn't mean he's better than the likes of Torres and Nani. Lets not forget, Torres scored more goals for Liverpool than Suarez did last season.

Suárez is the 3rd best player in the world la'

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Can't believe how much you Liverpool fans over-rate Suarez. OK he's had a good few months of form, but that doesn't mean he's better than the likes of Torres and Nani. Lets not forget, Torres scored more goals for Liverpool than Suarez did last season.

Kyro's not a liverpool fan.
Suarez is more than just about scoring goals, we've all heard it before.
Torres was in our team longer that season.
He is better than Torres.
Shut up Jamie. I'll have none of your sarcasm.

---

And Torres does have good stats, that's why I'm disputing him being an 86.

What's more laughable is Bale being the same rating as Nani

moscowmadeit3 wrote:What's more laughable is Bale being the same rating as Nani

On the bright side, VDV will be ineffective as his IF on UT was shite. Bale on the other hand..

Oh.. but Torres was there under the 'disastrous Hodgson era' which you all like to think never happened and still scored more.

Anderson's 76

Eternal Witcher wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Can't believe how much you Liverpool fans over-rate Suarez. OK he's had a good few months of form, but that doesn't mean he's better than the likes of Torres and Nani. Lets not forget, Torres scored more goals for Liverpool than Suarez did last season.

Kyro's not a liverpool fan.
Suarez is more than just about scoring goals, we've all heard it before.
Torres was in our team longer that season.
He is better than Torres.
Shut up Jamie. I'll have none of your sarcasm.

---

And Torres does have good stats, that's why I'm disputing him being an 86.

I'm not so sure about that first point. If Torres had stayed at Liverpool, and Chelsea had signed Suarez last summer, and he'd played the way he has, there'd be no fucking chance in hell that you guys would be criticising their comparative ratings. It would be all 'Torres is proven, Suarez had a few good months'. Speaking of which, I've hardly heard any criticism from you guys over Steven Gerrard's rating being too high, and he's been worse than Torres over the last 2 years, yet somehow he gets a higher rating than him. By the same logic that you guys are using re: Torres Vs. Suarez, Gerrard should be lower rated than the likes of Lucas, Meireles, Adam, Lampard, Carrick, Giggs et al, somehow that's never mentioned though. If he was ranked better than Xavi and Iniesta (which he often is by the way) you guys would have no complaints about that.

luke. wrote:Oh.. but Torres was there under the 'disastrous Hodgson era' which you all like to think never happened and still scored more.

Don't know why your defending him he's shite for you.

SpiritOfShankly wrote:

luke. wrote:Oh.. but Torres was there under the 'disastrous Hodgson era' which you all like to think never happened and still scored more.

Don't know why your defending him he's shite for you.

Just because he isn't performing amazingly doesn't mean he doesn't deserve support.

It's quite ironic you say that actually, because in January Liverpool fans were telling us that if he didn't perform well we'd turn on him and cast him aside..

SpiritOfShankly isn't the smartest guy you'll ever come across.

I see the replay function is still broken. Why can't it upload the replay from where I stop it?

luke. wrote:

SpiritOfShankly wrote:

Don't know why your defending him he's shite for you.

Just because he isn't performing amazingly doesn't mean he doesn't deserve support.

It's quite ironic you say that actually, because in January Liverpool fans were telling us that if he didn't perform well we'd turn on him and cast him aside..

You jump on anything that's said about Torres under performing making excuse after excuse.

Anderson=Class wrote:Anderson's 76

Even though that's a shabby rating, he usually performs well on the pitch for someone with a low rating.

Does anyone know Lucas's rating?

Is it a crime to defend your clubs players?

Pretty sure if I went around dissing Suarez I'd get a lot of people jumping on me.

Jamie wrote:SpiritOfShankly isn't the smartest guy you'll ever come across.

vice versa. cock.

kyro7 wrote:

Anderson=Class wrote:Anderson's 76

Even though that's a shabby rating, he usually performs well on the pitch for someone with a low rating.

Yes anderson was one of my favorite players on Fifa 11, got him in my first pack on ultimate team and never sold him, always performed and had great passing/shot/skills/pace. all round solid midfielder.

he deserved an 80/81 imo

Cleverley and Welbeck?

SpiritOfShankly wrote:

Jamie wrote:SpiritOfShankly isn't the smartest guy you'll ever come across.

vice versa. cock.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:

Kyro's not a liverpool fan.
Suarez is more than just about scoring goals, we've all heard it before.
Torres was in our team longer that season.
He is better than Torres.
Shut up Jamie. I'll have none of your sarcasm.

---

And Torres does have good stats, that's why I'm disputing him being an 86.

I'm not so sure about that first point. If Torres had stayed at Liverpool, and Chelsea had signed Suarez last summer, and he'd played the way he has, there'd be no fucking chance in hell that you guys would be criticising their comparative ratings. It would be all 'Torres is proven, Suarez had a few good months'. Speaking of which, I've hardly heard any criticism from you guys over Steven Gerrard's rating being too high, and he's been worse than Torres over the last 2 years, yet somehow he gets a higher rating than him. By the same logic that you guys are using re: Torres Vs. Suarez, Gerrard should be lower rated than the likes of Lucas, Meireles, Adam, Lampard, Carrick, Giggs et al, somehow that's never mentioned though. If he was ranked better than Xavi and Iniesta (which he often is by the way) you guys would have no complaints about that.

Thing is, I did say Gerrard is overrated if he is to be a 87. The problem is you naturally get ahead of yourself and rate him a 76. I just can't bother arguing if you are intent on going to the extreme.

Luke, shut up.

luke. wrote:Is it a crime to defend your clubs players?

Pretty sure if I went around dissing Suarez I'd get a lot of people jumping on me.

If you had reason to fair enough, Torres at this time deserves his criticism.

[quote="Jamie"]

SpiritOfShankly wrote:


vice versa. cock.

[/quote


Again ends his arguing with a face because there's no point.

Crossing is difficult.

SpiritOfShankly wrote:
Again ends his arguing with a face because there's no point.

That wasn't an argument, I was just calling you slooooooowwwwwwwwwww.