NZG wrote:SBSP wrote:We should get rid of all members with I in their name:
Filippo
Resurrection
Jamie
Pip
Jelavic
Both Viva's
Fluffy kittens
rei?
+38
Mouse
Hernandez_14
Zzonked
Dean
Uncle John from Jamaica
wellz
Jamie
blackskar
Cadbury
Cameron.
El Jefe
Muhkoo
Theo Filippo
Pippo
crump
Barton
Jordi
Demba Ba
JonjoShelvey
Danny
ShakerMatty
Walcott
Royal
Roloman4
Jord
JamieB
Clark
GK01
Steadman
Keanoo
Childish Logic
SBSP
Marvin
Sean
VivaRonaldoLAD
Kuled
Jack
luke.
42 posters
Chat Thread
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
- Post n°31
Re: Chat Thread
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
- Post n°32
Re: Chat Thread
For you, I can accept that.kyro7 wrote:kyrosevenSteadman wrote:You can't touch us S's.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°33
Re: Chat Thread
There was just this 6 foot prick at the desk trying to make me pick a card so he could do a trick, hes annoying as fuck and i wouldnt pick one so he went "stop being a maggot". I said call me something again you'll be out the hotel.
Hope he dies.
Hope he dies.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°34
Re: Chat Thread
Chris wrote:Moorzy you dont want me off this forum do you?
I just think you're completely different person when having a private MSN chat to when others are watching in a group chat or on the forums.
Childish Logic-
- Formerly known as : NZG
Posts : 13745
Age : 32
Supports : Lucas
- Post n°35
Re: Chat Thread
kyro7 wrote:kyrosevenSteadman wrote:You can't touch us S's.
that doesn't work. I touch kyro and sam all the time.
i'll grab my coat.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°36
Re: Chat Thread
You didn't answer my question.Moorzy2911 wrote:Chris wrote:Moorzy you dont want me off this forum do you?
I just think you're completely different person when having a private MSN chat to when others are watching in a group chat or on the forums.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°37
Re: Chat Thread
Maybe we should protest, I'd be willing to protest for a certain number of members to be banned in order to improve the overall quality of this forum, and balance out a better variety of fans to avoid all this argument business.
Mind you, I'm only here for another 2 days and by the time I'm back the activity will rocket due to football.
Mind you, I'm only here for another 2 days and by the time I'm back the activity will rocket due to football.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°38
Re: Chat Thread
Chris wrote:You didn't answer my question.Moorzy2911 wrote:Chris wrote:Moorzy you dont want me off this forum do you?
I just think you're completely different person when having a private MSN chat to when others are watching in a group chat or on the forums.
I don't necessarily want you off the forum...
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
- Post n°40
Re: Chat Thread
This is early.
Childish Logic-
- Formerly known as : NZG
Posts : 13745
Age : 32
Supports : Lucas
- Post n°41
Re: Chat Thread
Moorzy2911 wrote:Maybe we should protest, I'd be willing to protest for a certain number of members to be banned in order to improve the overall quality of this forum, and balance out a better variety of fans to avoid all this argument business.
Mind you, I'm only here for another 2 days and by the time I'm back the activity will rocket due to football.
wait you are being serious?? I was kidding. Baning someone because you don't like them is
Guest- Guest
- Post n°42
Re: Chat Thread
You know its pointless trying to get people banned or whatever.Moorzy2911 wrote:Chris wrote:You didn't answer my question.Moorzy2911 wrote:Chris wrote:Moorzy you dont want me off this forum do you?
I just think you're completely different person when having a private MSN chat to when others are watching in a group chat or on the forums.
I don't necessarily want you off the forum...
Mals forum and he couldn't give a shit about people arguing etc.
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
- Post n°45
Re: Chat Thread
ThisNZG wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:Maybe we should protest, I'd be willing to protest for a certain number of members to be banned in order to improve the overall quality of this forum, and balance out a better variety of fans to avoid all this argument business.
Mind you, I'm only here for another 2 days and by the time I'm back the activity will rocket due to football.
wait you are being serious?? I was kidding. Baning someone because you don't like them is
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 30
Location : Belfast
- Post n°47
Re: Chat Thread
Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
you might actually die soon.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°48
Re: Chat Thread
Edit.
Last edited by Jelavic9|RFC on Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°49
Re: Chat Thread
Chelsea fans eh?
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
- Post n°50
Re: Chat Thread
You also posted that twice. Get some rest.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°51
Re: Chat Thread
NZG wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:Maybe we should protest, I'd be willing to protest for a certain number of members to be banned in order to improve the overall quality of this forum, and balance out a better variety of fans to avoid all this argument business.
Mind you, I'm only here for another 2 days and by the time I'm back the activity will rocket due to football.
wait you are being serious?? I was kidding. Baning someone because you don't like them is
It's not just me who doesn't like them, loads of people hate them.
It's obvious that certain people, James, Fillipo and Pip etc just come on here to be cunts and purposely troll.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°52
Re: Chat Thread
Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
And you still managed to make Chicken pasta!!
FUCKING GUY, WHAT A GUY.
Keanoo-
- Posts : 11774
Age : 31
Supports : Manchester United
- Post n°53
Re: Chat Thread
luke. wrote:Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
you might actually die soon.
Randy Gardner holds the scientifically documented record for the longest period of time a human being has intentionally gone without sleep not using stimulants of any kind. In 1964—as a 17-year-old high school student in San Diego, California—Gardner stayed awake for 264 hours (eleven days), breaking the previous record of 260 hours held by Tom Rounds of Honolulu.
I might try and beat it sometime.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°54
Re: Chat Thread
Keanoo wrote:luke. wrote:Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
you might actually die soon.
Randy Gardner holds the scientifically documented record for the longest period of time a human being has intentionally gone without sleep not using stimulants of any kind. In 1964—as a 17-year-old high school student in San Diego, California—Gardner stayed awake for 264 hours (eleven days), breaking the previous record of 260 hours held by Tom Rounds of Honolulu.
I might try and beat it sometime.
Surely it does some sort of damage to your body.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°56
Re: Chat Thread
Try it.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I could do that, no shitting.
I'm not even tired.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 30
Location : Belfast
- Post n°57
Re: Chat Thread
Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I could do that, no shitting.
I'm not even tired.
Go to bed, you will be if you try and sleep.
Jack-
- Posts : 9767
Age : 28
- Post n°58
Re: Chat Thread
Tottenham residents taking the opportunity to get some new gear by robbing JJB after windows were smashed and get the weekly shop as Aldi also the victim of vandalism.
Keanoo-
- Posts : 11774
Age : 31
Supports : Manchester United
- Post n°60
Re: Chat Thread
Moorzy2911 wrote:Keanoo wrote:luke. wrote:Jelavic9|RFC wrote:I've not slept for about 76 hours.
you might actually die soon.
Randy Gardner holds the scientifically documented record for the longest period of time a human being has intentionally gone without sleep not using stimulants of any kind. In 1964—as a 17-year-old high school student in San Diego, California—Gardner stayed awake for 264 hours (eleven days), breaking the previous record of 260 hours held by Tom Rounds of Honolulu.
I might try and beat it sometime.
Surely it does some sort of damage to your body.
It is often claimed that Gardner's experiment demonstrated that extreme sleep deprivation has little effect, other than the mood changes associated with tiredness (mood swings, short temper, loss of concentration).[6] This is primarily due to a report by researcher William Dement, who stated that on the tenth day of the experiment, Gardner had been, among other things, able to beat Dement at pinball.
However, Lt. Cmdr. John J. Ross, who monitored his health, reported serious cognitive and behavioral changes. These included moodiness, problems with concentration and short term memory, paranoia, and hallucinations. On the fourth day he had a delusion that he was Paul Lowe winning the Rose Bowl, and that a street sign was a person. On the eleventh day, when he was asked to subtract seven repeatedly, starting with 100, he stopped at 65. When asked why he had stopped, he replied that he had forgotten what he was doing.[1]
On his final day, Gardner presided over a press conference where he spoke without slurring or stumbling his words and in general appeared to be in excellent health. "I wanted to prove that bad things didn't happen if you went without sleep," said Gardner. "I thought, 'I can break that (Peter Tripp's 1959) record and I don't think it would be a negative experience.'"