Sean wrote:Also heated debates is the point of a forum..
Shut the fuck up.
---
But yeah, the Guardian or my favorite news paper (because it has a pullout sports section which I take when my dad is reading the paper) The Daily Telegraph
+16
Cameron.
Cadbury
Fanatic
ResurrectionRooney
GK01
Pippo
Carlos Jenkinson
Theo Filippo
SBSP
crump
Drake
luke.
Jamie
Ricardo
blackskar
Sean
20 posters
Most respectable newspaper?
Guest- Guest
Shut the fuck up.
---
But yeah, the Guardian or my favorite news paper (because it has a pullout sports section which I take when my dad is reading the paper) The Daily Telegraph
GK01-
- Posts : 15559
Age : 28
Location : Brisbane, Australia.
Supports : Brisbane Roar
Playmaker Podcast
Guest- Guest
SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Drake-
- Posts : 16006
Age : 29
At 11 oclock every day the new transfer stores are posted on the Daily Mirror.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Daily Mail has a pretty good sports team tbh.
Pippo-
- Formerly known as : Pippo Inzaghi
Posts : 30777
Sean wrote:Pip wrote:I like the Solomon Star tbh.
Sure you do.
I sense sarcasm in this post. I read it online.
This is the paper. The sport section is only Solomon Islands based football though.
http://www.solomonstarnews.com/
Guest- Guest
Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
crump-
- Posts : 20116
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Isn't without the right way?
Guest- Guest
Do you think posting in complete sentences makes a constructive post? Fuck right offJelavic18|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Jamie-
- Posts : 24047
Age : 63
Location : Thiago
Supports : That Catalan club
Aaron wrote:In England I think Guardian, Telgraph and The Times all have some good sources and have writers capable of producing good work.
Pretty much. Independent maybe too for reliability.
crump-
- Posts : 20116
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
Don't take the bait Jelski.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
crump wrote:Most respectable: Daily Sport
Nah, Guardian or Independent : When they gossip.
SHITZ GOING DOWN.
Sport doesn't exist any more.
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
crump wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Isn't without the right way?
crump-
- Posts : 20116
ResurrectionRooney wrote:crump wrote:Most respectable: Daily Sport
Nah, Guardian or Independent : When they gossip.
SHITZ GOING DOWN.
Sport doesn't exist any more.
Probably due to how embarassing it was.
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Oh he's calling you out SBSP
Fanatic-
- Posts : 4855
Telegraphy, Times, Guardian and Si.com.
All still guilty of being sensationalists but it's what sells papers.
All still guilty of being sensationalists but it's what sells papers.
Guest- Guest
I like reading through The Sun for a laugh at their bullshit rumours from time to time, but if I'm looking for a decent article then i'll always have a look on the Guardian's website. My Dad went to school with one of their top sports journalists, pretty sure he's a Forest fan too as he's wrote some decent blogs and articles about us before which is pretty good seeing as most papers don't know about anything other than The Premier League and the top teams.
Guest- Guest
Bogdan wrote:Do you think posting in complete sentences makes a constructive post? Fuck right offJelavic18|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
Please refrain from trying to create heated debates without the community.
Sorry, Didn't realise I was the only one who made typo's.
And can we maybe have got a more constructive post out of you there?
Why should I fuck off? I have nothing to harm you. I haven't physically hurt you in any way, yet you seem to have hated me from the beginning even before I even really knew you and without giving me a chance.
Last edited by Jelavic18|RFC on Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
Guest- Guest
Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:Fonseca wrote:Guardian, but since Jela said it I might have to reconsider
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
You're no good at this are you Jela
Guest- Guest
Sean wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
You're no good at this are you Jela
That's what I like to see Sean, a little banter. Rather than aggressive bullying in which other members seem to get kicks out of.
Last edited by Jelavic18|RFC on Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Like I said typing in full sentences doesn't make your posts constructive. You post 300 times at least per day, you're a spammer. Go outside or something instead of racking up a ridiculous post count.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.Sean wrote:
You dont really believe thats his actual opinion do you?
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
Sean wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
You're no good at this are you Jela
Guest- Guest
Bogdan wrote:Like I said typing in full sentences doesn't make your posts constructive. You post 300 times at least per day, you're a spammer. Go outside or something instead of racking up a ridiculous post count.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:You get it Sean. I like you.
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
I'm sorry that I am not as intellectually complete as you and I can't spend my whole day recording videos about Liverpool.
Guest- Guest
Wow, you're actually a retard
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Sean wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
You're no good at this are you Jela
That's what I like to see Sean, a little banter. Rather than aggressive bullying in which other members seem to get kicks out of.
That's not banter, he's taking the piss out of your poorly put sentence
Last edited by Fonseca on Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:23 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Bogdan wrote:Wow, you're actually a retard
Exactly, Until you find a suitable reply. Please just don't bother.
Drake-
- Posts : 16006
Age : 29
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Like I said typing in full sentences doesn't make your posts constructive. You post 300 times at least per day, you're a spammer. Go outside or something instead of racking up a ridiculous post count.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Bogdan wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:
This should be a rule.
Posting in a manner which is intended to start an argument.
May well be a rule, haven't checked.
There should be a rule that people who post 300+ times per day should be banned for spamming.
But when they are taken out in a constrictive manner (talking about the future here) should it really be penalised?
I'm sorry that I am not as intellectually complete as you and I can't spend my whole day recording videos about Liverpool.
Cadbury-
- Posts : 23487
Age : 30
Location : Blackpool
Supports : Not Kenny.
Take this argument to the Argument Thread please.
