Jack Warner AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

He says he is not aware of any wrongdoing on his part as FIFA 'investigate' corruption from within.

Who the fuck is Jack Warner.

Cam wrote:Who the fuck is Jack Warner.

I think he's one of the cunts that wanted a bribe in return for him voting for our world cup bid.

Cam wrote:Who the fuck is Jack Warner.

Some cunt that bribes and fucks up FIFA with his need for money.

He's a TOUT.

Cam wrote:Who the fuck is Jack Warner.

Trinidad and Tobago bloke, something like vice-president of FIFA.

Wanted about a million from the FA to vote for our World Cup bid.

Jack Warner is probably the most corrupt mother fucker on the planet. Funny thing is, his CONCACAF pat'na in crime Chuck Blazer ratted him out.

There's no evidence of solicitation for bribes or any corruption in FIFA. And by "evidence" I mean 100% verifiable video and audio of a FIFA official demanding a bribe in exchange for a vote, in plain, direct and non-interpretational language. Because that appears to be the only type of evidence FIFA is willing to consider.

You laugh now, it'll probably be him leading the investigation.

dena wrote:Jack Warner is probably the most corrupt mother fucker on the planet. Funny thing is, his CONCACAF pat'na in crime Chuck Blazer ratted him out.

Damnit, I was going to say the same exact thing.

During the 2006 WC, he sold tickets at 300% profit. He toned it down during the 2010 WC, only making 60% profit from what they actually were worth.

Scuba Steve wrote:

dena wrote:Jack Warner is probably the most corrupt mother fucker on the planet. Funny thing is, his CONCACAF pat'na in crime Chuck Blazer ratted him out.

Damnit, I was going to say the same exact thing.

During the 2006 WC, he sold tickets at 300% profit. He toned it down during the 2010 WC, only making 60% profit from what they actually were worth.

Jeez he was raking it in.

Actually saw him at the New York - Seattle game earlier this year, he's massive.

This thread is racist.

menalawyerguy wrote:This thread is racist.

Well if FIFA is a race and hating it is racist......

Then I'm happy to be racist

menalawyerguy wrote:This thread is racist.

Calla da police!

Lux wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:This thread is racist.

Well if FIFA is a race and hating it is racist......

Then I'm happy to be racist

Well, Jack is black. And he's from a turd world errr third world country. So it's even worse to criticize him.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

menalawyerguy wrote:Well, Jack is black. And he's from a turd world errr third world country. So it's even worse to criticize him.

People in high places from third world countries are probably the most likely to be fraudulent.

The Bin Hammam guy is from the Middle East...taking into account that this is one of (if not the most) booming and modern economies in the world.....it's perhaps not surprising that the place is full of corruption as the religious ideology, as well as the pace at which everything has happened, has been too much for them to catch up.

I just can't imagine most of the officials I've seen from the FA involved in this World Cup process as being anywhere near corrupt. Not all of these men have anything to do with football.....and that is where the main problem is......football is a game and in this and age this is perhaps the last thing anyone considers. It's all about money.....and the English Football Association is probably the least corrupt of any recognisable nation's football association.

It's easy to say "Oh he's English he's just biased, England are shit heads" etc....but the fact is that we breathe football....it's the pride of our nation and we lost a battle we'd always lose.....because we were too innocent amongst a body of people who are everything wrong with football.

Lux wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:Well, Jack is black. And he's from a turd world errr third world country. So it's even worse to criticize him.

People in high places from third world countries are probably the most likely to be fraudulent.

The Bin Hammam guy is from the Middle East...taking into account that this is one of (if not the most) booming and modern economies in the world.....it's perhaps not surprising that the place is full of corruption as the religious ideology, as well as the pace at which everything has happened, has been too much for them to catch up.

Trinidad and Tobago isn't a third world country you mong

Fonseca wrote:Trinidad and Tobago isn't a third world country you mong

There's more well off countries, but true.

But I wasn't specifically talking about them anyway, mong

It is third world anyway.

To be fair, if you think of the true meaning of a third world country, it is.

It's not Somalia, but it's still a developing country.

Answer me this then, is Jamaica a third world country?

Fonseca wrote:Answer me this then, is Jamaica a third world country?

It's not even a discussion, it's factually a third world country.

Lux wrote:To be fair, if you think of the true meaning of a third world country, it is.

It's not Somalia, but it's still a developing country.

It was a third world country, as it was aligned with neither NATO or the Soviet United. However, since the Cold War isn't going on any more, it would be rather misleading to refer to countries as First, Second, or Third World countries.

Lux wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Answer me this then, is Jamaica a third world country?

It's not even a discussion, it's factually a third world country.

No it's fucking not, don't try and act like you know what you're talking about

answer my question, is Jamaica a third world country?

Yes it is.

Scuba Steve wrote:It was a third world country, as it was aligned with neither NATO or the Soviet United. However, since the Cold War isn't going on any more, it would be rather misleading to refer to countries as First, Second, or Third World countries.

Cut the specifics, I know that it's not the "politically correct" term as it might sound offensive to some people...but "a developing country" is just a different name.

Honestly I've had enough of 10 page long arguments on here over definitions when it's obvious what point is being made regardless.

MEDC and LEDC are more appropriate terms.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Yes it is.

Bring out your fact book then

B0dunrin wrote:MEDC and LEDC are more appropriate terms.

I've done GCSE geography, I know the terms.

I just don't care, because anyone who thinks of the Cold War when they hear of "third world country" is ancient or a cock.

I can understand why you might find it offensive, and "developing country" sounds a lot better.....but it's the same thing, and people who use "third world" or "first world" are referring to "developed" or "developing".....

The other meaning is dead....it's just excessive or political to make a point of it.

Fonseca wrote:No it's fucking not, don't try and act like you know what you're talking about

answer my question, is Jamaica a third world country?

Yes, because it's a developing country. There's no doubt about that.

Problem?