Ashley Young - Where will he go?

Manchester.City reserves

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:Liverpool, Id have him here though, more the style of winger we need than lennon.

Really? Lennon is a class winger and in my opinion better then Young.

Young has a lot more to him that Lennon. Can actually cross the ball.

People don't give Lennon enough credit for his crossing he really has worked on it, and it's much better.

Sorry Sam. Ashley Young is better in every single way.

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:Liverpool, Id have him here though, more the style of winger we need than lennon.

Really? Lennon is a class winger and in my opinion better then Young.

Young has a lot more to him that Lennon. Can actually cross the ball.

People don't give Lennon enough credit for his crossing he really has worked on it, and it's much better.

Sorry Sam. Ashley Young is better in every single way.

Not in pace

But in all seriousness I don't feel he is but we'll get no where arguing.

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Really? Lennon is a class winger and in my opinion better then Young.

Young has a lot more to him that Lennon. Can actually cross the ball.

People don't give Lennon enough credit for his crossing he really has worked on it, and it's much better.

Sorry Sam. Ashley Young is better in every single way.

Not in pace

But in all seriousness I don't feel he is but we'll get no where arguing.

True dat. Bring him up in the next podcast

"Jord asks, who would you rather have in your team Aaron Lennon or Ashley Young and why?"

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:Young has a lot more to him that Lennon. Can actually cross the ball.

People don't give Lennon enough credit for his crossing he really has worked on it, and it's much better.

Sorry Sam. Ashley Young is better in every single way.

Not in pace

But in all seriousness I don't feel he is but we'll get no where arguing.

True dat. Bring him up in the next podcast

"Jord asks, who would you rather have in your team Aaron Lennon or Ashley Young and why?"

Ok since I don't answer the question I just ask them

The more money he costs, the better. Don't give a shit who he goes to as long as they get Watford the most sell on fees as possible

We can't even afford a new £800k pitch.....ours is 13 years old

Lux wrote:The more money he costs, the better. Don't give a shit who he goes to as long as they get Watford the most sell on fees as possible

We can't even afford a new £800k pitch.....ours is 13 years old

You can play in my garden if you want.

The-Reporter wrote:You can play in my garden if you want.

Well, I think we use Arsenal's old training ground....it's next door

Zzonked wrote:I think City need a winger, but I hope it's not Ashley Young. Don't get me wrong, he's a good player, but I just think his Englishness will cost someone double what he's worth. I think there's better, more promising foreigners, who could be signed for less money.

Lol, as if it would even matter for $hitty

----------Huddlestone-Modric
Lennon------Young------Bale
----------------VDV

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:

GK01 wrote:

Jord wrote:Young has a lot more to him that Lennon. Can actually cross the ball.

People don't give Lennon enough credit for his crossing he really has worked on it, and it's much better.

Sorry Sam. Ashley Young is better in every single way.

Not in pace

But in all seriousness I don't feel he is but we'll get no where arguing.

True dat. Bring him up in the next podcast

"Jord asks, who would you rather have in your team Aaron Lennon or Ashley Young and why?"

That would be a good question.

I would prefer Ashley Young, he offers more than pace and a decent cross. Hes a good set peice taker, can cut in and has a decent shot on him, better crosser, the only thing Lennon has on Young is his pace.

I would love to have him at United, but i agree about his "Englishness" raising the price tag. It would be a shame to lose him to Liverpool though.

Young is the better than Lennon imo, Young will most likely be on the LW for United, where he can cut in, pass, cross and shoot. He's also pretty fast and a decent finisher. Lennon though is all about running to the byline and getting a cross onto Crouchie's head. He can't shoot and he can't finish. He would be a good purchase for Liverpool though, they need someone to cross onto the target man's head.

Arsenal

Fonseca wrote:Arsenal

But that would mean that Wenger would spend money?
Are such things possible?

One can dream

And0TheGr8 wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Arsenal

But that would mean that Wenger would spend money?
Are such things possible?

It's between Man Utd and Liverpool most likely. I wouldn't put money on it.

Jord wrote:

And0TheGr8 wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Arsenal

But that would mean that Wenger would spend money?
Are such things possible?

It's between Man Utd and Liverpool most likely. I wouldn't put money on it.

This. would prefer if we got Hazard or Sanchez

I hate him enough as it is, can't imagine how much i'll hate him if he goes to Liverpool

Liverpool.

Fonseca wrote:One can dream

I've been wondering, are you using that avatar because of the girl, Canales or his pink t-shirt?

I would not want him at Arsenal. We have Arshavin Nasri Walcott and with the money needed to buy Young we could easily spend onn a player like Hummells or Maybe Chiellini

Lennon is faster and has a better cross. No doubt about that but Young is a better player, He can cross, finish and get past a player. IMO the teams to go in for him will be utd, Liverpool and City. I hope we get him but competing with 200k wages and champions league will be hard so i think he will be moving to utd.

Gegilworld93 wrote:

Zzonked wrote:I think City need a winger, but I hope it's not Ashley Young. Don't get me wrong, he's a good player, but I just think his Englishness will cost someone double what he's worth. I think there's better, more promising foreigners, who could be signed for less money.

Lol, as if it would even matter for $hitty

We have money, so it doesn't matter if we pay more for a worse player? Nice logic. Even if the money doesn't matter, the quality of the player does.

I think Arsenal or Manchester United would be the best destinations for him.

we need black guys at Liverpool, we need people like him so you can point your fuckingfingers and say thats the bad guy!!!

NZG wrote:Lennon is faster and has a better cross. No doubt about that but Young is a better player, He can cross, finish and get past a player. IMO the teams to go in for him will be utd, Liverpool and City. I hope we get him but competing with 200k wages and champions league will be hard so i think he will be moving to utd.

Most times he just runs directly at a defender and then throws himself to the floor. He's probably the biggest diver in the premier league

Hitchy wrote:

NZG wrote:Lennon is faster and has a better cross. No doubt about that but Young is a better player, He can cross, finish and get past a player. IMO the teams to go in for him will be utd, Liverpool and City. I hope we get him but competing with 200k wages and champions league will be hard so i think he will be moving to utd.

Most times he just runs directly at a defender and then throws himself to the floor. He's probably the biggest diver in the premier league

can still get past a player.