Never liked it, I dont really understand why it is in place is playing at home really that much of an advantage?
anyway what are your thoughts?
anyway what are your thoughts?
+9
El Jefe
Lux
Scuba Steve
Sean
Zzonked
ResurrectionRooney
menalawyerguy
Mal
LFC_Grunners
13 posters
The Away Goals Rule
Poll
Should it be scrapped?
- [ 8 ]
[38%]
- [ 13 ]
- [62%]
Total Votes: 21
LFC_Grunners-
- Posts : 3115
Age : 103
Supports : Liverpool
Mal-
- Posts : 31043
Age : 34
Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
Guest- Guest
I was reading something, it was like, it's unfair cos the team who are away in he second leg, could have An extra 30 minutes to score an away goal, if it goes to extra time
menalawyerguy-
- Posts : 6547
Age : 111
Cameron_LFC wrote:I was reading something, it was like, it's unfair cos the team who are away in he second leg, could have An extra 30 minutes to score an away goal, if it goes to extra time
Exactly. This is precisely why it should be scrapped. During the first leg, there's no chance of extra time. If all is tied after the second leg though, then the game will go into extra time and the team that is at home is at a decided tactical disadvantage because a goal for the away team is basically worth two (well, one and a half, I guess. But you get the point).
Guest- Guest
Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Guest- Guest
What the fuck are you on about you mad cunt?James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
menalawyerguy-
- Posts : 6547
Age : 111
The-Reporter wrote:What the fuck are you on about you mad cunt?James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Made sense to me.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Mal wrote:Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
What an insightful analysis.
James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
Zzonked-
- Posts : 24290
Age : 32
menalawyerguy wrote:The-Reporter wrote:What the fuck are you on about you mad cunt?James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Made sense to me.
Me too.
James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
Well that isn't because of away goals really though, is it?
Edit: Wait, nevermind, I get it. Away goals make up for the fact that the other team is playing at home.
Guest- Guest
Cross bar challenge is the only way forward
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
Ever since our game against Barcalona away goals can fuck off 
menalawyerguy-
- Posts : 6547
Age : 111
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Mal wrote:Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
What an insightful analysis.James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
True. I guess either way you do it, one of the teams is going to have an advantage. I guess they figure counting away goals through extra time compensates for the advantage that the home team has of playing an extra 30 minutes at home.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
menalawyerguy wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Mal wrote:Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
What an insightful analysis.James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
True. I guess either way you do it, one of the teams is going to have an advantage. I guess they figure counting away goals through extra time compensates for the advantage that the home team has of playing an extra 30 minutes at home.
Exactly. It's a good rule generally, but that's one part of it I disagree with. I'd just have it going straight to penalties after 180 minutes though, you can't exactly counter-balance the advantages of being at home with the Away Goals Rule, and being at home in a penalty shootout really doesn't make any difference.
LFC_Grunners-
- Posts : 3115
Age : 103
Supports : Liverpool
A tournament is to decide who the best team is, The best team shoud be able to play well both home + away without the away goal advantage
simples.
simples.
Guest- Guest
Good when it works in your favour but when it doesn't you're gutted.
Guest- Guest
James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
yhat's how it used to work in the playoffs for a couple of seasons.
Guest- Guest
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Mal wrote:Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
What an insightful analysis.James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
thats the luck of the draw though isn't it?
by that logic the FA Cup is unfair because the home team have home advantage!
menalawyerguy-
- Posts : 6547
Age : 111
kyro7 wrote:Good when it works in your favour but when it doesn't you're gutted.
Scuba Steve-
- Posts : 6682
Age : 37
'orrible bastard wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Mal wrote:Its good in the fact that it encourages away teams to attack but on the whole I think it's shit.
What an insightful analysis.James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Because then the team at home in the second leg have an advantage in that they get another 30 minutes playing at home.
thats the luck of the draw though isn't it?
by that logic the FA Cup is unfair because the home team have home advantage!
The difference between that (for me), is that you can't really have the FA Cup any other way (not feasible to have two games for each round).
However, it's not like a knockout round has to have that rule in place. They could easily say that away goals can get you to extra time, but it doesn't have to decide it.
Guest- Guest
menalawyerguy wrote:kyro7 wrote:Good when it works in your favour but when it doesn't you're gutted.
Guest- Guest
The-Reporter wrote:What the fuck are you on about you mad cunt?James ♠ wrote:Well why don't they just say away goals only get used after normal time. If it is equal after then then it is normal extra time, no away goals.
Retard.
Guest- Guest
What the fuck are you on about you mad cunt?
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
It gives "worse" teams a better chance......also makes the two legs more tactical.
El Jefe-
- Formerly known as : Jay
Posts : 10657
Location : In the hall, already, on the wall, already
Supports : Pixie Lott's Legs
Rafa had two-legged ties mastered 
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Jay.Davies11 wrote:Rafa had two-legged ties mastered
Er...if I remember correctly his last two two-legged ties against decent opposition ended in a defeat on the Away Goals Rule, and absolute carnage in Stamford Bridge.
Guest- Guest
Always hated it. Pointless rule. No goal should be worth more than another.
Barton-
- Formerly known as : JMB_94
Posts : 10066
Age : 30
Pointless rule, but it defo makes things more interesting.
Uncle John from Jamaica-
- Posts : 8455
Age : 32
I have hazy memories of Ruud Van Nistelrooy scoring a consolation against Real at the Bernebau and the commentator just screamed 'AWAYYY GOALLL!!!!' as if it was the most important thing ever. 
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
yarnbury11 wrote:I have hazy memories of Ruud Van Nistelrooy scoring a consolation against Real at the Bernebau and the commentator just screamed 'AWAYYY GOALLL!!!!' as if it was the most important thing ever.
It was a goal which made it 3-1 in the first leg at the Bernebau, it gave United a small chance of progressing rather than a microscopic one.
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
Don't see what's wrong with it. The fact that the second leg goes to ET doesn't give one a huge advantage over the other. One gets 30 extra minutes at home, and the other gets 30 extra minutes to score an away goal. 
|
|
|