Stoke vs Liverpool | Sky sports 1

we should have started Coates.

El_indian wrote:we should have started Coates.

Agreed, Skrtel is a hoofball merchant without strength or brains.

kyro7 wrote:Shelvey is such a vile bald piece of shit.

Yes, let's mock players' illnesses now.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Shelvey is such a vile bald piece of shit.

Yes, let's mock players' illnesses now.

Yep, bald fuck.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, let's mock players' illnesses now.

Yep, bald fuck.

You saw that you got a reaction from me, so you continued to post in the same manner. That is trolling, and a bannable offense.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, let's mock players' illnesses now.

Yep, bald fuck.

You saw that you got a reaction from me, so you continued to post in the same manner. That is trolling, and a bannable offense.

I continued to post in the same way because I hate that cunt and don't care what you think.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:You saw that you got a reaction from me, so you continued to post in the same manner. That is trolling, and a bannable offense.

I continued to post in the same way because I hate that cunt and don't care what you think.

Suarez does not like black people, does not care what Evra thinks, and spoke as he wanted. Is racially abusing a man acceptable?

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:You saw that you got a reaction from me, so you continued to post in the same manner. That is trolling, and a bannable offense.

I continued to post in the same way because I hate that cunt and don't care what you think.

Suarez does not like black people, does not care what Evra thinks, and spoke as he wanted. Is racially abusing a man acceptable?

It might not be acceptable, but I didn't say it was, just I wasn't trolling.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Suarez does not like black people, does not care what Evra thinks, and spoke as he wanted. Is racially abusing a man acceptable?

It might not be acceptable, but I didn't say it was, just I wasn't trolling.

Yes, you were. You can stumble around the point with failed rhetoric, but it is still trolling.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Suarez does not like black people, does not care what Evra thinks, and spoke as he wanted. Is racially abusing a man acceptable?

It might not be acceptable, but I didn't say it was, just I wasn't trolling.

Yes, you were. You can stumble around the point with failed rhetoric, but it is still trolling.

Even if it is I don't care.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, you were. You can stumble around the point with failed rhetoric, but it is still trolling.

Even if it is I don't care.

It is against the rules and it is your job as an administrator to enforce those rules, you idiot. You should care.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, you were. You can stumble around the point with failed rhetoric, but it is still trolling.

Even if it is I don't care.

It is against the rules and it is your job as an administrator to enforce those rules, you idiot. You should care.

I don't care when I'm getting a lesson on trolling from the master troll.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:It is against the rules and it is your job as an administrator to enforce those rules, you idiot. You should care.

I don't care when I'm getting a lesson on trolling from the master troll.

Yes, because wanting someone to acknowledge his sins is "trolling." You made an offensive joke in an attempt to get a few smileys from your cronies, your offensive joke offended me (go figure), and I expect you to repent.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:It is against the rules and it is your job as an administrator to enforce those rules, you idiot. You should care.

I don't care when I'm getting a lesson on trolling from the master troll.

Yes, because wanting someone to acknowledge his sins is "trolling." You made an offensive joke in an attempt to get a few smileys from your cronies, your offensive joke offended me (go figure), and I expect you to repent.

I made no joke.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, because wanting someone to acknowledge his sins is "trolling." You made an offensive joke in an attempt to get a few smileys from your cronies, your offensive joke offended me (go figure), and I expect you to repent.

I made no joke.

So you seriously hate Shelvey because he has Alopecia? That seems particularly shallow, even by your standards.

I look forward to some new players coming

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Yes, because wanting someone to acknowledge his sins is "trolling." You made an offensive joke in an attempt to get a few smileys from your cronies, your offensive joke offended me (go figure), and I expect you to repent.

I made no joke.

So you seriously hate Shelvey because he has Alopecia? That seems particularly shallow, even by your standards.

No I hate him because he comes across as a vile cunt, but I thought I'd point out he's bald too at the same time because I dislike him.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:So you seriously hate Shelvey because he has Alopecia? That seems particularly shallow, even by your standards.

No I hate him because he comes across as a vile cunt, but I thought I'd point out he's bald too at the same time because I dislike him.

You associated his baldness with negative characteristics, it doesn't take a cunning linguist to deduce that you have something against his disease.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:So you seriously hate Shelvey because he has Alopecia? That seems particularly shallow, even by your standards.

No I hate him because he comes across as a vile cunt, but I thought I'd point out he's bald too at the same time because I dislike him.

You associated his baldness with negative characteristics, it doesn't take a cunning linguist to deduce that you have something against his disease.

I'm not looking at it about a disease though, I'm just saying he's a bald cunt the same way I'd say Suarez is a buck tooth cunt.

kyro7 wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:You associated his baldness with negative characteristics, it doesn't take a cunning linguist to deduce that you have something against his disease.

I'm not looking at it about a disease though, I'm just saying he's a bald cunt the same way I'd say Suarez is a buck tooth cunt.

You imply that buck teeth are negative because you group it with the C word. If you had called him the "fun-loving bucktooth genius," you would have implied that his bucktoothedness is not necessarily a negative feature of his. You added negative connotations to his baldness, and his baldness is beyond his control.

Glen Damon wrote:

kyro7 wrote:No I hate him because he comes across as a vile cunt, but I thought I'd point out he's bald too at the same time because I dislike him.

You associated his baldness with negative characteristics, it doesn't take a cunning linguist to deduce that you have something against his disease.

It doesn't matter what mood I'm in, I love reading your posts

El Jefe wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:You associated his baldness with negative characteristics, it doesn't take a cunning linguist to deduce that you have something against his disease.

It doesn't matter what mood I'm in, I love reading your posts

Thank you.

Stoke fully deserved the win, were in Liverpool faces from start to finish and they couldn't handle it. Jones was completely dominant in the air, bullied Skrtel and Agger.