Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


+4
Barton
Chamakh29
Bushido
Kuled
8 posters

    Fabianski

    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Fabianski Empty Fabianski

    Post by Guest Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:28 am

    Did it again, Just Amazing. not worthy
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 28

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Kuled Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:29 am

    Bendtner was so amazed even he didn't score.
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Bushido Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:29 am

    Yeah I don't know why Arsenal don't sign a world class keeper.
    Chamakh29
    Chamakh29
     
     


    Posts : 122
    Location : van Persie's physio room

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Chamakh29 Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:30 am

    Chamakh and Koscielny did jack shit to challenge Carroll there.

    Shit performance overall bar Jack and Song and encouraging from RvP
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Barton Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:31 am

    Just when we were all saying that Fabianski could be reliable after all, he goes and fucks up again. Laughing

    Oh Arsene, will you ever learn?
    Grenade
    Grenade
     
     


    Formerly known as : grenade187
    Posts : 9113
    Age : 43

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Grenade Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:32 am

    Give him a fucking break the defending was fucking gash today you cannot ask any goalkeeker to keep a clean sheet playing with that fucking shit team known as Arsenal today.

    I dont think I have seen us play as bad as today ever before, funny fans want to point the finger on induviduals when near about everybody was FUCKING SHIT today.

    Fabregas was one of the worst players on the pitch for most of the time Neutral never taught I would ever say that.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Guest Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:32 am

    I'll tell you all why Arsenal didn't score a late goal, there was nothing to play for. Against West Ham there was drive because 3 points were still on the table.

    Fabiasnki is a fucking spastic retard.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Guest Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:34 am

    grenade187 wrote:Give him a fucking break the defending was fucking gash today you cannot ask any goalkeeker to keep a clean sheet playing with that fucking shit team known as Arsenal today.

    I dont think I have seen us play as bad as today ever before, funny fans want to point the finger on induviduals when near about everybody was FUCKING SHIT today.

    Fabregas was one of the worst players on the pitch for most of the time Neutral never taught I would ever say that.
    Don't give a fuck. How did Newcastle get 3 points tell me that.

    I'll give you a hint.. spastic.
    blackskar
    blackskar
     
     


    Posts : 12479

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by blackskar Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:35 am

    The-Reporter wrote:I'll tell you all why Arsenal didn't score a late goal, there was nothing to play for. Against West Ham there was drive because 3 points were still on the table.

    Fabiasnki is a fucking spastic retard.

    So the fact we could have still got a point (1point is better then 0 Wink) isn't enough to fucking play then?

    Give over Rolling Eyes
    Grenade
    Grenade
     
     


    Formerly known as : grenade187
    Posts : 9113
    Age : 43

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Grenade Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:37 am

    Yes, spastic. Spastic performance by the whole team !

    Fabianski was not bad today bar from 1 error he was playing decent today tbh.

    Chamakh... Oh my god near about everything he touched turned into shit, Bendtner was a waste of space.

    Cant beleive you singled Fabianski out when there was about 5 players who played worser than him today.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Guest Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:39 am

    grenade187 wrote:Yes, spastic. Spastic performance by the whole team !

    Fabianski was not bad today bar from 1 error he was playing decent today tbh.

    Chamakh... Oh my god near about everything he touched turned into shit, Bendtner was a waste of space.

    Cant beleive you singled Fabianski out when there was about 5 players who played worser than him today.
    Newcastle had one good effort on goal.

    Fabianski was busy flapping around the box so it just so happened we might aswell of had a pigeon guarding our net.
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Barton Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:39 am

    Makes me laugh how Wenger has a great chance to sign either Joe Hart, Shay Given, or Mark Schwarzer in the summer, but he decided to stick with Almunia and Fabianski. Laughing

    Wenger has completely lost the plot.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Guest Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:43 am

    JMB_94 wrote:Makes me laugh how Wenger has a great chance to sign either Joe Hart, Shay Given, or Mark Schwarzer in the summer, but he decided to stick with Almunia and Fabianski. Laughing

    Wenger has completely lost the plot.
    Should have released both of them 3 years ago. Neutral
    Grenade
    Grenade
     
     


    Formerly known as : grenade187
    Posts : 9113
    Age : 43

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Grenade Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:45 am

    JMB_94 wrote:Makes me laugh how Wenger has a great chance to sign either Joe Hart, Shay Given, or Mark Schwarzer in the summer, but he decided to stick with Almunia and Fabianski. Laughing

    Wenger has completely lost the plot.

    We were never going to sign them 2, City would not sell them to a top 4 rival, like they did not let Bellamy leave for Spurs.

    Schwarzer would be a short term solution, but even then he would not really be the quality of goalkeeper we would need. We already have Szcesny who I always rated so I personally dont think we even need a keeper.
    coolhead33
    coolhead33
     
     


    Posts : 3755

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by coolhead33 Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:50 am

    grenade187 wrote:
    JMB_94 wrote:Makes me laugh how Wenger has a great chance to sign either Joe Hart, Shay Given, or Mark Schwarzer in the summer, but he decided to stick with Almunia and Fabianski. Laughing

    Wenger has completely lost the plot.

    We were never going to sign them 2, City would not sell them to a top 4 rival, like they did not let Bellamy leave for Spurs.

    Schwarzer would be a short term solution, but even then he would not really be the quality of goalkeeper we would need. We already have Szcesny who I always rated so I personally dont think we even need a keeper.
    Wenger in disguise?

    I agree though Szcesny is really good. I didn't see him play last season but he did keep clean sheets against most of the top teams in the division.
    blackskar
    blackskar
     
     


    Posts : 12479

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by blackskar Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:51 am

    If anything I'd like us to sign a proper 100% proven GK (Like Neuer) and get rid of Almunia and Fabianski, promoting Szczesny to 2nd in line and using Mannone as 3rd choice.
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Barton Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:56 am

    grenade187 wrote:
    JMB_94 wrote:Makes me laugh how Wenger has a great chance to sign either Joe Hart, Shay Given, or Mark Schwarzer in the summer, but he decided to stick with Almunia and Fabianski. Laughing

    Wenger has completely lost the plot.

    We were never going to sign them 2, City would not sell them to a top 4 rival, like they did not let Bellamy leave for Spurs.

    Schwarzer would be a short term solution, but even then he would not really be the quality of goalkeeper we would need. We already have Szcesny who I always rated so I personally dont think we even need a keeper.

    Well Joe Hart and Shay Given were currently battling for the number 1 spot at Man City, Wenger could of easily came in and brought either of 'em, he can defo grab Given in January as he has confirmed that he wants to leave City.

    And Mark Schwarzer is defo one of the best GKs in the EPL, and Wenger could of easily swooped him as he actually handed in a transfer request at Fulham. Seriously, why didn't he sign him? Neutral
    blackskar
    blackskar
     
     


    Posts : 12479

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by blackskar Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:59 am

    Because he seems to like giving our GK's way too many chances.
    avatar
    Sean
     
     


    Posts : 33857
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Sean Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:00 am

    More like cos Fulham wanted an extra million or something
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Barton Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:01 am

    blackskar wrote:Because he seems to like giving our GK's way too many chances.

    Exactly, what the fuck is wrong with him? Surely he can see that he clearly has serious GK problems. Neutral
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 30

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Barton Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:03 am

    Sean CFC wrote:More like cos Fulham wanted an extra million or something

    Worth it to be honest, Wenger badly needs a goalkeeper even if he doesn't know it. Neutral
    Grenade
    Grenade
     
     


    Formerly known as : grenade187
    Posts : 9113
    Age : 43

    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Grenade Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:03 am

    Because theres no point in paying £5million for a goalkeeper that will retire in a season or 2. £5M is alot of money for a goalkeeper we could buy younger, better keepers for the same money.

    City wont sell Given to us. No matter how much he wants to join us.

    Sponsored content


    Fabianski Empty Re: Fabianski

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:23 pm