Yes, more than ever before.
+13
menalawyerguy
El_indian
Laurencio
easley91
jaq bauwer
coolhead33
Grenade
Sean
Cam
jeb4eva
LFC_Grunners
Harrold
crump
17 posters
Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
Poll
Topic Title
- [ 11 ]
[73%]
- [ 4 ]
- [27%]
Total Votes: 15
crump-
- Posts : 20116
Harrold-
- Posts : 7124
Age : 30
Supports : The Gas.
It was due a long, long time ago.
LFC_Grunners-
- Posts : 3115
Age : 103
Supports : Liverpool
- Post n°3
Re: Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
by LFC_Grunners Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:12 am
Not video, that slows the game down. Just a chip on the ball or whatever.
Guest- Guest
We have needed it for ages now. It must be brought in.
jeb4eva-
- Posts : 4445
Age : 34
Location : Mars
Supports : Manchester United
Only a simpleton would argue against bringing it in at this stage.
Cam-
- Posts : 9668
Age : 29
Location : Shrewsbury
Supports : Liverpool Football Club
Goal Line technology will only come in if something happens in the Champions League final or the world cup final. 
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
How the fuck does video slow the game, it takes about 15 seconds, not that big a sacrifice for correct decisions
Cam-
- Posts : 9668
Age : 29
Location : Shrewsbury
Supports : Liverpool Football Club
jeb4eva wrote:Only a simpleton would argue against bringing it in at this stage.
crump-
- Posts : 20116
They can always add it on to injury time, which is no different than a player rolling round crying on the floor for about a minute.
Guest- Guest
L. wrote:jeb4eva wrote:Only a simpleton would argue against bringing it in at this stage.
Grenade-
- Formerly known as : grenade187
Posts : 9113
Age : 43
Do you honestly think anyone is going to say no lol ?
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
Someone did
coolhead33-
- Posts : 3755
- Post n°13
Re: Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
by coolhead33 Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:40 am
The less injury time the better as some people might miss the last train home at night etc.crump wrote:They can always add it on to injury time, which is no different than a player rolling round crying on the floor for about a minute.
crump-
- Posts : 20116
coolhead33 wrote:The less injury time the better as some people might miss the last train home at night etc.crump wrote:They can always add it on to injury time, which is no different than a player rolling round crying on the floor for about a minute.
It's not like it will happen every game, just for important decisions etc etc. Like today, for example.
jaq bauwer-
- Posts : 182
Age : 34
Supports : Cruzeiro EC / Arsenal FC
- Post n°15
Re: Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
by jaq bauwer Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:23 am
I agree that video thing could slows the game, but goal line tecnology is urgently needed !
I don't know how the goal line technology was not adopted after that England x Germany in WC 2010...
I don't know how the goal line technology was not adopted after that England x Germany in WC 2010...
Guest- Guest
no. As you saw today, we saw about 3 replays before the ref had managed to get spurs players out of his face and start the game again, therefore it would add 10-20 extra to the pause maximumLFC_Grunners wrote:Not video, that slows the game down. Just a chip on the ball or whatever.
easley91-
- Posts : 4463
Age : 33
Location : Crawley
Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell
Why can't someone in a TV truck have a mic with the ref and say goal or not? Wouldn't take long at all. Or have an official somewhere secluded from fans/managers/players with a TV and give them a few replays to determine the decision. With nobody around in a quiet room, nothing could influence him.
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
LFC_Grunners wrote:Not video, that slows the game down. Just a chip on the ball or whatever.
Yeah, because watching the match on TV the game really does get slowed down? Have a fourth man sit in a booth and watch the game on TV, and if a ref is uncertain about something he just asks the guy in the booth.
easley91-
- Posts : 4463
Age : 33
Location : Crawley
Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell
Even though that goal didn't prove the difference it still should not have been given. Something needs to be done, but while Blatter is still in charge nothing will be done.
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
Yeah we could quite easily sort out a correct decision in the time it takes for a team to crowd around and argue with the ref.
As others have mentioned we should have a 5th official sitting in a room with instant access to replays.
I would like a challenge system - give each manager 2 challenges per match.
As others have mentioned we should have a 5th official sitting in a room with instant access to replays.
I would like a challenge system - give each manager 2 challenges per match.
menalawyerguy-
- Posts : 6547
Age : 111
- Post n°21
Re: Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
by menalawyerguy Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:20 pm
The time was June 27, 2010
Guest- Guest
we will get a week of everyone calling for technology and then everyone going "yes i mean it isnt even a debate"
then 2 weeks later everyone forgets about it and nothing is done as always
then 2 weeks later everyone forgets about it and nothing is done as always
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
ViVaRooney wrote:we will get a week of everyone calling for technology and then everyone going "yes i mean it isnt even a debate"
then 2 weeks later everyone forgets about it and nothing is done as always
It happens every week now so if everyone goes on about each incident for 2 weeks then it will never stop
But yeah...people can only moan so much, FIFA etc know about the problems they are just slow at implementing change.
Drake-
- Posts : 16006
Age : 29
Rugby, Tennis and Cricket have it so why not Football?
RubyArmyCTFC-
- Posts : 2240
Location : Cheltenham
Supports : Cheltenham Town
- Post n°25
Re: Is now the time for video evidence in Football?
by RubyArmyCTFC Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:16 am
Drake wrote:Rugby, Tennis and Cricket have it so why not Football?
All those sports are a stop-start game. Football is a free flowing game. I think Fifa are worried that having goal line technology will lead to further orders for video evidence to be implemented to examine penalties and offside decisions for example.
I personally don't want it as I enjoy the odd controversial decision in football. That's one reason why the game is so exciting to watch.
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 35
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
If by now you mean "like 2009" then yes, now is the time.
Drake-
- Posts : 16006
Age : 29
I bet you wouldn't feel the same if your team lost a final or got relegated through a decision which was wrong and that could be proved by the technology?RubyArmyCTFC wrote:Drake wrote:Rugby, Tennis and Cricket have it so why not Football?
All those sports are a stop-start game. Football is a free flowing game. I think Fifa are worried that having goal line technology will lead to further orders for video evidence to be implemented to examine penalties and offside decisions for example.
I personally don't want it as I enjoy the odd controversial decision in football. That's one reason why the game is so exciting to watch.
Guest- Guest
RubyArmyCTFC wrote:Drake wrote:Rugby, Tennis and Cricket have it so why not Football?
All those sports are a stop-start game. Football is a free flowing game. I think Fifa are worried that having goal line technology will lead to further orders for video evidence to be implemented to examine penalties and offside decisions for example.
I personally don't want it as I enjoy the odd controversial decision in football. That's one reason why the game is so exciting to watch.
Rugby is no more stop start than Football. Infact, I'd say football is more stop start with the amount of free kicks, throw ins and corners that are given and the time taken to actually take these. In rugby the play doesn't stop unless a penalty is given or a try is scored/getting checked out.
