Manchester United FC Official Thread

Young playing tomorrow?

Hopefully. The form of Young and Valencia.

Hopefully not.

Keep the:


Going.

Quicker Hernandez is out the better

kyro7 wrote:Hopefully not.

Keep the:

Hernandez

Young - Rooney - Valencia

Going.

That would do me.

Andy wrote:

Welbeck
Young - Rooney - Valencia

Quicker Hernandez is out the better

I really don't think so, with Hernandez if we have Welbeck, Rooney and Valencia, he's in the areas to score and you know Rooney and Welbeck will too, I think it's one of those games where we should just give it to Valencia and let him rip Riise apart, I wouldn't mind Young though..

Hernandez would be a good impact sub, even though I doubt we'd be losing. Welbeck obviously comes inside more whereas I think the width which Young and Valencia provide will be crucial.

We won't drop Hernandez when he scored 2 goals away from home last week

What does that have to do with anything? Rooney didn't score does that mean he should be dropped? No. Welbeck also scored and he creates more opportunities by chasing loose balls and has better link-up play.

Which is why they should all play because it's been played 2 games in a row and worked.

Question. Why do Manchester United Football Club player have to have sly dig's at Manchester City Football Club fan base? Is it because Manchester United Football Club players seem threatened by Manchester City Football Club

Im glad you are back Jay Jay

Sean wrote:Im glad you are back Jay Jay

in a good way I hope

Andy wrote:

limerickcitykid wrote:rooney is such a tinker

lmao.

it is true tho, i swear there are about ten rooney looking fellas livin across town with their caravans trying to steal my stuff.

So glad my boy's still going strong.

kyro7 wrote:Which is why they should all play because it's been played 2 games in a row and worked.

Exactly.

Roloman4 wrote:So glad my boy's still going strong.

Valencia

Roloman4 wrote:So glad my boy's still going strong.

He's going stronger than ever, right now our best player with Rooney.

Sexy Jay Jay wrote:Question. Why do Manchester United Football Club player have to have sly dig's at Manchester City Football Club fan base? Is it because Manchester United Football Club players seem threatened by Manchester City Football Club

I believe you should ask Rio this question.

http://www.talksport.co.uk/magazine/features/120325/nani-i-hear-city-have-more-fans-manchester-i-havent-seen-them-166549

o, should we call you Luis or Nani?

“Nani is fine.” [“It’s Nar-ni,” says his agent, laughing. “It’s Nar-ni, not Nanni. You always get it wrong.”]

Who does?

[The agent: “Everyone in England, you say Nanni, but it should be Nar-ni – it should be softer.”]

i never knew that lol

I don't feel comfortable saying it, I'm used to saying it that way

In 2011/12, #MUFC have had 68 injuries, compared to #MCFC's 28.

And Mancini had the nerve to complain about injuries..

Has anyone noticed how much Valencia is smiling this season, he rarely did in his first 2 seasons here

Yeah, the English are terrible when it comes to pronouncing names from Romance languages, I mean they don't even get close, and if that's not bad enough they end up butchering it too. I bet it gets to the players too but they just live with it.

Actually the English aren't the only culprits, American commentators are just as bad if not worse. Like saying Velasquez as Ve-laz-quez.

They aren't too bad with Hernandez though, of course they say it wrong too but it's pretty close, at least if it was translated to English that's how it would sound.

The nickname is different story though.

Go Raiders.

Sometimes they say Chicharito like.. Chikarito. So annoying

I never say that, because I always call him Hernandez.

I used to try say Chicharito but now its just easier saying Hernandez

Chicharito has that spanish ch that is apparently impossible for commentators to prenounce.

Pretty much yeah

Most commentators say Hernandez anyway.

Apart from the cunt on MUTV.

Anyway predictions for tonight? i think 2-0 or 3-1 to us.