You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:22 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by LFC_Grunners Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:31 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Laurencio Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:49 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:18 am
Increase prestige of FIFA Club World Cup by hosting it in major football stadia - Wembley, Camp Nou, the Maracana, Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, the Azteca, not exclusively in Asian countries
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Potato-7 Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:11 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:13 am
Pippo Inzaghi wrote:Make it so an Oceania team is guaranteed to play in the World Cup instead of playig some shitty playoff match.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:09 am
Lux wrote:-Start "Respect for clubs" campaign where if officials do not respect clubs by doing their job right they will be punished. Raise officials salaries so there is more interest and so that more can become professional.
-Stop two footed tackles being an automatic red card. Perfectly good tackles are not only called fouls, but then get players booked / sent off. Seen it too many times..it's disgraceful.
-Revoke that bullshit rule recently added where Premier League teams blackmailed Football League teams into accepting very low fees for youth players being poached, otherwise funding would be cut. Simple way to solve it is to remove the power from Premier League clubs and create a non biased body that represents every team in the Football League. All TV rights are owned by them and are distributed via them i.e. don't mess.
-Remove the Financial Fair Play rule. It's not fair, all it does is secure big teams place at the top of the table as no team can spend as much as them. I'm not against foreign owners investing.....it's good for the economy and it's good for football.....much better than cunt owners who just take money out of the club. Only thing I'd consider is a wage limit of say..£200k p/w....but only say 2/3 players could get that. After that....max wage is £120k p/w for 3/4 players or something like that......would stop one team taking all the big players. End of the day, if teams are allowed to borrow money they cannot pay back that is the fault of the lenders and I wouldn't interfere with that.
You can't do these things, you are not the Prime Minster, you cannot seize people's businesses.-What I would do is make sure that assets of the club and any assets of the owner are frozen and priority for any funds goes to other teams who are owed money, then players/staff of the team (except executives/owners), then the actual lenders, then the executives and finally the owners.
-Owners can only take 2% interest above inflation on any loans made to the club. They may pay themselves a fee capped at £1m but scaling down depending on total revenue for any executive/director role they hold. No other money may be taken away from the football club for owners or third parties to take as profit. It may be used for redevelopment only if it is deemed in the interest of the club.
-No one can own more than 49% of a club. Supporters trust for each club with at least 20% ownership of the club. Obviously as this will rip off some current owners....they will be compensated in the shares being converted to a reasonable loan payable to them based on current share prices + any inflation over the period of repayment.
-No holding companies for clubs.
-More power to clubs in terms of contracts. If a player is proven to have refused to play without good reason then they forfeit right to any future wages with the club and can be fined 4 weeks wages + a fine decided by tribunal which could go into millions depending on their contract + if found guilty will be banned from professional football in all professional leagues worldwide for a maximum of 2 years.
-Increase fines for racism and tapping players up. It is the right of the club to privately accept or reject another club's approaches for a player. Any people tapping staff up who are found to be working on behalf of a club will be fined and the club could receive penalties such as fines, point deductions, transfer bans, relegation etc depending on severity/frequency of offences.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Demba Ba Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:12 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Demba Ba Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:22 am
Forest wrote:I would implement safe standing areas back into our football grounds, using the same model as Germany.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:38 am
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Childish Logic Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:43 am
Pretty much this but also remove financial fair play and add a wage cap.Laurencio wrote:1. Allow Goal line technology,
2. Establish an independent comitte to investigate corruption and financial crimes in football,
3. Establish an award system that awards clubs for developing their own players (well, begin the implementation, will probably take longer than 4 years),
4. Ban FAs who do not pass a "keep football clean" investigation,
5. Increase funding to Women's soccer (cause it doesn't really make enough money for FIFA atm)
6. and possibly establish a comitte to review transfers of young players in football, and take action if foul play is discovered.
Oh and although I am confident I wouldn't make an ass out of myself in the media as much as Blatter does, I'd probably hire someone to deal with the press for me.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Laurencio Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:44 am
Forest wrote:I would implement safe standing areas back into our football grounds, using the same model as Germany.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Demba Ba Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:01 am
ResurrectionRooney wrote:I'd definitely do that, although it'd still be banned at Anfield.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:06 am
cheesy wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:I'd definitely do that, although it'd still be banned at Anfield.
Why?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:cheesy wrote:
Why?
Two reasons
1) Liverpool fans are too dangerous to be allowed in standing areas
2) To protect the feelings of their fans, who might find it offensive.
Mr Leiva wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Two reasons
1) Liverpool fans are too dangerous to be allowed in standing areas
2) To protect the feelings of their fans, who might find it offensive.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by Demba Ba Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:10 am
ResurrectionRooney wrote:cheesy wrote:
Why?
Two reasons
1) Liverpool fans are too dangerous to be allowed in standing areas
2) To protect the feelings of their fans, who might find it offensive.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:18 am
cheesy wrote:You've obviously just made up a load of drivel on the spot.
We've moved on a generation since incidents that would make you think this. Many of the fans back then, who according to you pose a dangerous threat, would not attend games anymore, and there would be many younger supporters as well.
Also, it's not that Liverpool fans are dangerous. It's that the security officials couldn't do their job properly, and allowed too many people into the ground. If you travel to a big game, and find out that the stadium is packed, what will you do? You're hardly going to up sticks and decide not to attend the game, are you? You'll go in anyway, just to see your team.
Their fans wouldn't find it offensive. I'm sure Liverpool fans were amongst the most upset when the all seater rules were introduced, as many of the regular fans would have loved standing in the Kop week in week out.
In the end that held more fans, even though Liverpool had an average crowd that was double that of Nottingham Forest.Forest wrote:Mr Leiva wrote:
Mr Resurrection Rooney makes a valid point. Fans of Nottingham Forest were in the very same stadium on that fatal day, being controlled by the very same police force.
Why dont you fuck off and die you disgusting basterd.ResurrectionRooney wrote:cheesy wrote:You've obviously just made up a load of drivel on the spot.
We've moved on a generation since incidents that would make you think this. Many of the fans back then, who according to you pose a dangerous threat, would not attend games anymore, and there would be many younger supporters as well.
Also, it's not that Liverpool fans are dangerous. It's that the security officials couldn't do their job properly, and allowed too many people into the ground. If you travel to a big game, and find out that the stadium is packed, what will you do? You're hardly going to up sticks and decide not to attend the game, are you? You'll go in anyway, just to see your team.
Their fans wouldn't find it offensive. I'm sure Liverpool fans were amongst the most upset when the all seater rules were introduced, as many of the regular fans would have loved standing in the Kop week in week out.
I haven't made up anything, as recently as 2007 Liverpool fans were described as the worst fans in Europe, and had thousands of ticketless drunk fans in the Champions League Final in that year, and the following two years at Stamford Bridge when they were being dumped out.
Further, the age of the average Premier League fan has increased dramatically since 1989, most of the same fans would still be going. And the younger fans will likely be their kids, who have been dragged up with no morals. If the stadium is packed I would go to the pub, I am not that selfish to risk other people's safety just to watch the game myself.
I think a lot of their fans would find it offensive, Dalglish was complaining about the idea of it being considered a while ago.
Re: You are made President of FIFA, the IFA and the FAW by ResurrectionRooney Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:40 am
Alan wrote:Why dont you fuck off and die you disgusting basterd.ResurrectionRooney wrote:
I haven't made up anything, as recently as 2007 Liverpool fans were described as the worst fans in Europe, and had thousands of ticketless drunk fans in the Champions League Final in that year, and the following two years at Stamford Bridge when they were being dumped out.
Further, the age of the average Premier League fan has increased dramatically since 1989, most of the same fans would still be going. And the younger fans will likely be their kids, who have been dragged up with no morals. If the stadium is packed I would go to the pub, I am not that selfish to risk other people's safety just to watch the game myself.
I think a lot of their fans would find it offensive, Dalglish was complaining about the idea of it being considered a while ago.
Too good at what, posting on a football forum, I bet you are a geek that is not very well liked and this is your only escape, acting like a smart cunt on a football forumResurrectionRooney wrote:Alan wrote:Why dont you fuck off and die you disgusting basterd.
Because I am too good.
|
|
|
