Chat Thread

Rei Andros wrote:

Always happens.

I can relate to that.

I do that with tumblr.

I've engineered a solution to my problems.

Let's play a game. Click the random article generator on Wikipedia until you get an article that talks about something you are familiar with or heard of. It took me 10 tries until I finally got Sudan.

What a fun game. You should work for EA Sports.

ahlycotc wrote:Let's play a game. Click the random article generator on Wikipedia until you get an article that talks about something you are familiar with or heard of. It took me 10 tries until I finally got Sudan.

Got nothing for a while so I've gave up.

I'm off to bed...night all, get back to work Blukacs.

Nah going to sleep

My final gift of the night.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:What a fun game. You should work for EA Sports.

Let me ask you a sincere question. Why do you have to be so negative about everything I post, especially when I'm not directing it towards you. I can only come up with two possible explanations.

1) You want a reaction from me (i.e. you are a troll).
2) You are obsessed with me.

I believe it's a combination of both, but you tell me.

ahlycotc wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:What a fun game. You should work for EA Sports.

Let me ask you a sincere question. Why do you have to be so negative about everything I post, especially when I'm not directing it towards you. I can only come up with two possible explanations.

1) You want a reaction from me (i.e. you are a troll).
2) You are obsessed with me.

I believe it's a combination of both, but you tell me.

That was positive. Why do you always assume the worst in me?

Jamie wrote:Thought it was just me.

Oh yeah I watched the 1st episode of Wilfred by the way, didn't really like it

Give it another episode.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Let me ask you a sincere question. Why do you have to be so negative about everything I post, especially when I'm not directing it towards you. I can only come up with two possible explanations.

1) You want a reaction from me (i.e. you are a troll).
2) You are obsessed with me.

I believe it's a combination of both, but you tell me.

That was positive. Why do you always assume the worst in me?

It's very obvious you were being sarcastic in your comment. My question still stands.

And as for wanting a reaction from you, you're damn right I want a reaction from you. I'm a man of science, a seeker of the ultimate truth and unveiler of fact - if I ask you provocative questions, questions you find extremely difficult or impossible to answer without making up bullshit about poetry, it is because I am genuinely confused by how a man who is ostensibly intelligent could believe what you claim to believe when you have read into it. And let's not forget, if you are right, then my questioning you could save my soul if you give satisfactory answers.

The reason I try to provoke a reaction is that I am baffled by how you can justify the inconsistency of a vengeful egotistical maniac who demands to be worshipped, demands people to believe in him with no evidence, already knows which of his creations is going to fail in the world he created for them, and will send them to suffer for eternity when they do, and is morally the greatest being in the universe.

Think of any person you know of who you would describe as being a good person, would ANY of them behave in that way if they had the power to? Send human beings to be tortured for eternity? I sure as fuck wouldn't, and because of that I consider myself morally superior to the God you describe, I consider you morally superior to him, fuck I even consider Hitler to be morally superior to him, and if you were looking at it objectively, and you weren't shit scared of this guy you believe in, you would too.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:And as for wanting a reaction from you, you're damn right I want a reaction from you. I'm a man of science, a seeker of the ultimate truth and unveiler of fact - if I ask you provocative questions, questions you find extremely difficult or impossible to answer without making up bullshit about poetry, it is because I am genuinely confused by how a man who is ostensibly intelligent could believe what you claim to believe when you have read into it. And let's not forget, if you are right, then my questioning you could save my soul if you give satisfactory answers.

The reason I try to provoke a reaction is that I am baffled by how you can justify the inconsistency of a vengeful egotistical maniac who demands to be worshipped, demands people to believe in him with no evidence, already knows which of his creations is going to fail in the world he created for them, and will send them to suffer for eternity when they do, and is morally the greatest being in the universe.

Think of any person you know of who you would describe as being a good person, would ANY of them behave in that way if they had the power to? Send human beings to be tortured for eternity? I sure as fuck wouldn't, and because of that I consider myself morally superior to the God you describe, I consider you morally superior to him, fuck I even consider Hitler to be morally superior to him, and if you were looking at it objectively, and you weren't shit scared of this guy you believe in, you would too.

That's all dandy, you didn't answer my question though. This isn't about religion. You seem to make negative comments towards me when comes to anything. Your previous attack on me is an example. The incident when you said my suggestion of renaming a title was shit was another example. I'll ask you one last time. Why do you seem to always make negative comments towards my posts? Let me repeat, this has nothing to do with religion.

ahlycotc wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:And as for wanting a reaction from you, you're damn right I want a reaction from you. I'm a man of science, a seeker of the ultimate truth and unveiler of fact - if I ask you provocative questions, questions you find extremely difficult or impossible to answer without making up bullshit about poetry, it is because I am genuinely confused by how a man who is ostensibly intelligent could believe what you claim to believe when you have read into it. And let's not forget, if you are right, then my questioning you could save my soul if you give satisfactory answers.

The reason I try to provoke a reaction is that I am baffled by how you can justify the inconsistency of a vengeful egotistical maniac who demands to be worshipped, demands people to believe in him with no evidence, already knows which of his creations is going to fail in the world he created for them, and will send them to suffer for eternity when they do, and is morally the greatest being in the universe.

Think of any person you know of who you would describe as being a good person, would ANY of them behave in that way if they had the power to? Send human beings to be tortured for eternity? I sure as fuck wouldn't, and because of that I consider myself morally superior to the God you describe, I consider you morally superior to him, fuck I even consider Hitler to be morally superior to him, and if you were looking at it objectively, and you weren't shit scared of this guy you believe in, you would too.

That's all dandy, you didn't answer my question though. This isn't about religion. You seem to make negative comments towards me when comes to anything. Your previous attack on me is an example. The incident when you said my suggestion of renaming a title was shit was another example. I'll ask you one last time. Why do you seem to always make negative comments towards my posts? Let me repeat, this has nothing to do with religion.

I thought it was a wonderfully fun, creative game, you obviously don't know how to take a compliment. While not writing posts, I have spent the last 20-30 minutes clicking away on articles waiting to see what I would find. The amount of time I have spent getting lost on TVTropes would amaze you.

I always seem to because you perceive my posts incorrectly, I do not always respond to your posts negatively, in fact I don't reply to most of them at all. If it massages your ego to think I am obsessed with you then fine, but I make sarcastic comments to everyone on here, even the people who worship and adore me.

Your suggestion was shit, that's why I said it was shit, and your comment about 'That's Sexist' in a thread about banning men from football matches bordered on the retarded, that's why I posted the MotO image.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

That's all dandy, you didn't answer my question though. This isn't about religion. You seem to make negative comments towards me when comes to anything. Your previous attack on me is an example. The incident when you said my suggestion of renaming a title was shit was another example. I'll ask you one last time. Why do you seem to always make negative comments towards my posts? Let me repeat, this has nothing to do with religion.

I thought it was a wonderfully fun, creative game, you obviously don't know how to take a compliment. While not writing posts, I have spent the last 20-30 minutes clicking away on articles waiting to see what I would find. The amount of time I have spent getting lost on TVTropes would amaze you.

I always seem to because you perceive my posts incorrectly, I do not always respond to your posts negatively, in fact I don't reply to most of them at all. If it massages your ego to think I am obsessed with you then fine, but I make sarcastic comments to everyone on here, even the people who worship and adore me.

Your suggestion was shit, that's why I said it was shit, and your comment about 'That's Sexist' in a thread about banning men from football matches bordered on the retarded, that's why I posted the MotO image.

You didn't provide an explanation as to why it was shit. Please do now. And you are one to talk about messaging egos.

Also, your signature about me is misleading.

ahlycotc wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

I thought it was a wonderfully fun, creative game, you obviously don't know how to take a compliment. While not writing posts, I have spent the last 20-30 minutes clicking away on articles waiting to see what I would find. The amount of time I have spent getting lost on TVTropes would amaze you.

I always seem to because you perceive my posts incorrectly, I do not always respond to your posts negatively, in fact I don't reply to most of them at all. If it massages your ego to think I am obsessed with you then fine, but I make sarcastic comments to everyone on here, even the people who worship and adore me.

Your suggestion was shit, that's why I said it was shit, and your comment about 'That's Sexist' in a thread about banning men from football matches bordered on the retarded, that's why I posted the MotO image.

You didn't provide an explanation as to why it was shit. Please do now. And you are one to talk about messaging egos.

Also, your signature about me is misleading.

I found it to be incredibly pedantic. I do have a big ego, I don't deny that.

You're right, sorry, that grammatically error was just ridiculous! It made it look as though God sent Satans to Earth on rocks. Now it's back to the sensible thing of God creating rocks in space to hurl at Satans who are already on the Earth.

ahlycotc wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:What a fun game. You should work for EA Sports.

Let me ask you a sincere question. Why do you have to be so negative about everything I post, especially when I'm not directing it towards you. I can only come up with two possible explanations.

1) You want a reaction from me (i.e. you are a troll).
2) You are obsessed with me.

I believe it's a combination of both, but you tell me.

You have a hater. He has an obvious dislike towards you so either put him on ignore or just laugh at his childish posts.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

You didn't provide an explanation as to why it was shit. Please do now. And you are one to talk about messaging egos.

Also, your signature about me is misleading.

I found it to be incredibly pedantic. I do have a big ego, I don't deny that.

You're right, sorry, that grammatically error was just ridiculous! It made it look as though God sent Satans to Earth on rocks. Now it's back to the sensible thing of God creating rocks in space to hurl at Satans who are already on the Earth.

Just because it's pedantic, doesn't make it a shit suggestion. You could have easily not replied to my thread.

That's not what I'm getting at. Let me ask you this, why do meteorites exist?

grenade187 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Let me ask you a sincere question. Why do you have to be so negative about everything I post, especially when I'm not directing it towards you. I can only come up with two possible explanations.

1) You want a reaction from me (i.e. you are a troll).
2) You are obsessed with me.

I believe it's a combination of both, but you tell me.

You have a hater. He has an obvious dislike towards you so either put him on ignore or just laugh at his childish posts.

I might consider putting him on ignore again. The forum was much more peaceful with him on it. It was fun seeing him get annoyed when I didn't reply to him too.

ahlycotc wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

I found it to be incredibly pedantic. I do have a big ego, I don't deny that.

You're right, sorry, that grammatically error was just ridiculous! It made it look as though God sent Satans to Earth on rocks. Now it's back to the sensible thing of God creating rocks in space to hurl at Satans who are already on the Earth.

Just because it's pedantic, doesn't make it a shit suggestion. You could have easily not replied to my thread.

That's not what I'm getting at. Let me ask you this, why do meteorites exist?

I don't agree.

Because Asteroids get pulled towards the Earth by it's gravitational pull. Their paths are fairly predictable albeit not with 100% accuracy using modern methods, I consider it highly unlikely that God would have aimed these meteorites billions of years ago so that they would collide with the Earth and impact devils on the ground. After all, if these devils were crafty devils, they could ask a scientist where the meteorites were likely to hit and then avoid them.

That's not why they exist. That's how they exist.

In that case there is no why they exist, they just exist.

So they have no purpose?

Why do you guys always write a fucking 5 paragraph essay every time you respond to each other?

SBSP wrote:That's not why they exist. That's how they exist.

That was going to be my exact response.

I know perfectly well how asteroids came to be. I'm asking you why they were created in the first place. Is it possible that something may have multiple reasons/uses of existence? Of course the whole devil thing sounds ridiculous to you because you don't believe in a God let alone devils. So I ask myself, why do I even have this discussion with you.

NiTRO wrote:Why do you guys always write a fucking 5 paragraph essay every time you respond to each other?

I don't.

When it's long, it's easier to ignore TBH.

SBSP wrote:

NiTRO wrote:Why do you guys always write a fucking 5 paragraph essay every time you respond to each other?

I don't.

When it's long, it's easier to ignore TBH.

I wasn't talking about you tho... RR always does that shit.

Of course it's possible, it just seems a bit unlikely that billions of years ago God would use his foresight to aim rocks at devils, even when humans with free will could ascertain where they would strike. If Devils worked out where the meteorites were going to strike, could they fly to heaven?

Isn't it more likely that it was simply an ignorant explanation for rocks falling to Earth that was written by a guy who was quite stupid or deluded. If it was written in any other book from the same time period that's exactly what any rational person would think of it.

When you British people say "ten stone" or whatever amount for weight, what does a "stone" equal out to in pounds?