Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Probably the main reason for him being shit.Dan wrote:Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
Dan wrote:Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
kyro7 wrote:Probably the main reason for him being shit.Dan wrote:Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
He had a good Copa America though, to be fair.Jord wrote:Why is everyone acting like they're happy with this Caotes guy. We don't have a fucking clue who he is and anyone who says they do is lying. Some people think he might even replace Carragher. No, no, fucking no. He's some 20 year old from South America.
Jord wrote:Why is everyone acting like they're happy with this Caotes guy. We don't have a fucking clue who he is and anyone who says they do is lying. Some people think he might even replace Carragher. No, no, fucking no. He's some 20 year old from South America.
Groce.Dan wrote:kyro7 wrote:Probably the main reason for him being shit.Dan wrote:Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Hyypia > Ferdinand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vidic
kyro7 wrote:Groce.Dan wrote:kyro7 wrote:Probably the main reason for him being shit.Dan wrote:Cadbury wrote:Haven't a fucking clue who he is. He's 6"5" so I doubt he's going to be fast.
Sami Hyypia wasn't fast.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Hyypia > Ferdinand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vidic
Ferdinand > Vidic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hyypia.
Jord wrote:I'm not saying he'll be shit or that he isn't good. The fact is we just don't know.. Yet so many people are like "Oh rather this Caotes lad than Dann or whatever" What do you fucking know?
Scott wrote:Jord wrote:I'm not saying he'll be shit or that he isn't good. The fact is we just don't know.. Yet so many people are like "Oh rather this Caotes lad than Dann or whatever" What do you fucking know?
Who said that?
I bet it's in the back of young Cadbury's mind.Scott wrote:Jord wrote:I'm not saying he'll be shit or that he isn't good. The fact is we just don't know.. Yet so many people are like "Oh rather this Caotes lad than Dann or whatever" What do you fucking know?
Who said that?
Jord wrote:I bet it's in the back of young Cadbury's mind.Scott wrote:Jord wrote:I'm not saying he'll be shit or that he isn't good. The fact is we just don't know.. Yet so many people are like "Oh rather this Caotes lad than Dann or whatever" What do you fucking know?
Who said that?
Cam wrote:I hate it when the new EA guys quote something and don't write a comment
Cam wrote:I hate it when the new EA guys quote something and don't write a comment
xPeterLFC95 wrote:I'm tired of hearing about Arsenal fans say they only lost because their team was threadbare.
They were missing: Gibbs, Wilshere, Song, and maybe Gervinho from their starting lineup.
We were missing: Gerrard, Skrtel, Johnson, with our two most creative players starting from the bench. We are so sorry that our backups (ie Kelly) are better than theirs.
No, both teams had around 6-8 regulars each on the pitch-that is about what most teams have for 25-30 games a season.ResurrectionRooney wrote:I always find this a weird argument. Lets say United played Barcelona soon, and both teams rested their whole first XI because it was a friendly or a pointless match or a virus outbreak whatever, and United won 2-1. Does this mean that United are a better side because both sides were equally without their top players, equally virus hit or equally treating is as unimportant, or that United would have won if it was First XI against First XI? No, all it means is that United might have better back-ups than Barcelona.
It's just a childish retort, if you beat Arsenal reserves next week with your reserves, when they say it was just a reserve match are you going to say 'Yeah well it was our reserves too hahahaha' ?
Dan wrote:Sterling in the squad for tomorrow apparently.
Dan wrote:Sterling in the squad for tomorrow apparently.