ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
If it's an intentional foul then yes. You are breaking the rules of the game intentionally, that's cheating in my book.Lux wrote:ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
Lux wrote:ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.ahlycotc wrote:Lux wrote:ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.
What's your definition of cheating?
Scott wrote:Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.ahlycotc wrote:Lux wrote:ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.
What's your definition of cheating?
ahlycotc wrote:Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.
What's your definition of cheating?
Lux wrote:ahlycotc wrote:Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.
What's your definition of cheating?
Well, I'd expect cheaters to be banned.
Where as in game offences are punished with in the game (usually) i.e. a foul = a free kick....not the player being kicked out of the game for cheating.
Match fixing, going in the refs changing rooms....playing 12 men...sabotaging the pitch on purpose etc.....those are cheating offences imo.
SuperManUtd wrote:everyone that voted yes is a fucking disgrace.
ahlycotc wrote:Scott wrote:Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.ahlycotc wrote:Lux wrote:ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.
So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?
It's not really how I think of cheating
Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.
What's your definition of cheating?
You are then intentionally breaking the rules (implied rules of a relationship) to gain an unfair advantage (more pussy while your girlfriend is trying to be loyal towards you).
SuperManUtd wrote:everyone that voted yes is a fucking disgrace.
polska. wrote:Yes, Handballing is technically cheating, but it's not cheating by the rulebooks - It's just a normal foul like any other. That's what I think Lux is trying to say.
ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
polska. wrote:ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
I don't think you understand that that means fuck all when it happens in the box.
This is how I break it down, quite simple actually:
Hand + Ball = Handball = Foul = not in box = Free Kick
Intention + Hand + Ball = Intentional Handball = Foul = not in Box = Yellow Card + Free Kick
Defensive Team + Hand + Ball = Defensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Red Card + Penalty
Offensive Team + Hand + Ball = Offensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Yellow Card + Goal Kick
Lux wrote:ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
The definition of whether something deserves a yellow/red or not isn't "They are cheating or not?"....and almost every foul most likely gives you an unfair advantage.
You see it based on the intention of the player, but for me fouls are a part of the game....if you regularly play football as a defender you'd understand that That said, you're a referee so you have the opposite perspective.
I wouldn't even say diving is cheating. I don't see it as cheating because you're fooling the ref..... I think of it as the players responsibility is to win the game.....and it's the refs responsibility to uphold the rules of the game. The player is doing his best to win the game, it's not his fault the ref is incapable of making the right decision. Sure, it's not honourable but when they're getting paid massive wages and there's so much at stake, I wouldn't expect every player to care.
The responsibility ultimately lies with FIFA
SBSP wrote:I could take what you just said and say, "It's okay people murder and steal because they're trying to make as much money and have the best chance of living as possible. It's the police's problem with which to deal and I don't mind their doing it."
SBSP wrote:As do ours.
You said "Great minds think alike," so I said, "As do ours." Think about it for a second.ahlycotc wrote:SBSP wrote:As do ours.
What? That's what I was referring to. We both took Lux's statement as murdering is OK if you aren't found guilty and get payed a lot of money.
ahlycotc wrote:Like I said earlier, not all fouls are cheating, but all cheating are fouls (if during play). Classing something as cheating is not in the rule book, it's subjective. A lot of fouls are properly punished (i.e. direct freekick, yellow card, red card, etc.). So I understand if you don't agree with me on calling a specific act as cheating.
If I intentionally stick my hand up to stop a shot on goal from going in, that's cheating imo. But if I intentionally foul someone in the middle of the park to prevent a counterattack (aka tactical foul), that's not really cheating in my book.
Now it's shocking to hear that you view diving as not cheating. I think it's one of the most agreed upon concepts. Diving should have no place in football. It shouldn't matter how much you get paid or how important the match is, diving is cheating.
Sure the referee is responsible for enforcing the rules, but referees can and do miss things. It doesn't change the fact that an act is considered cheating. If you murder someone and the judge claims you are not guilty, you are still a murderer by definition.
SBSP wrote:I could take what you just said and say, "It's okay people murder and steal because they're trying to make as much money and have the best chance of living as possible. It's the police's problem with which to deal and I don't mind their doing it."
ahlycotc wrote:polska. wrote:ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
I don't think you understand that that means fuck all when it happens in the box.
This is how I break it down, quite simple actually:
Hand + Ball = Handball = Foul = not in box = Free Kick
Intention + Hand + Ball = Intentional Handball = Foul = not in Box = Yellow Card + Free Kick
Defensive Team + Hand + Ball = Defensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Red Card + Penalty
Offensive Team + Hand + Ball = Offensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Yellow Card + Goal Kick
Too many variables and equations, so let me simplify. First, we will assume that we know what constitutes a handball.
Any handball committed with intention is punishable with a yellow card. A handball committed (with intention or not) that denies an obvious goal scoring opportunity is punishable by a red card. A handball that is committed without intention or denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity is not punished by any card, just a direct freekick.
It does not really matter if the handball occurred in the box or not. A red card for handball is given only if it is denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity.