Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


+26
Potato-7
Grenade
SBSP
Ricardo
El Jefe
Lux
Carlos Jenkinson
Theo Filippo
luke.
Cadbury
Fanatic
Marvin
Royal
Jord
Zzonked
ayvee1
Dean
Kuled
Barton
ResurrectionRooney
Pippo
dena
Laurencio
JamieB
lesser21
Jamie
30 posters

    Yes or No.

    Poll

    Would you have stopped the ball with your hands?

    [ 33 ]
    Yes or No. - Page 4 Bar_left65%Yes or No. - Page 4 Bar_right [65%] 
    [ 18 ]
    Yes or No. - Page 4 Bar_left35%Yes or No. - Page 4 Bar_right [35%] 

    Total Votes: 51
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 32
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Lux Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:18 am

    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:21 am

    "Cheating refers to the overt or covert breaking of rules to gain advantage in a competitive situation" (Wikipedia).

    Handball = breaking rules + gaining advantage

    Coffee
    ayvee1
    ayvee1
    .
    .


    Formerly known as : Prince
    Posts : 5862
    Age : 34

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by ayvee1 Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:23 am

    Lux wrote:
    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think
    If it's an intentional foul then yes. You are breaking the rules of the game intentionally, that's cheating in my book.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:24 am

    Lux wrote:
    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think

    Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:28 am

    ahlycotc wrote:
    Lux wrote:
    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think

    Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?
    Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:29 am

    Well played Scotty. -_-
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:30 am

    Scott wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:
    Lux wrote:
    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think

    Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?
    Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.

    You are then intentionally breaking the rules (implied rules of a relationship) to gain an unfair advantage (more pussy while your girlfriend is trying to be loyal towards you).
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 32
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Lux Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:32 am

    ahlycotc wrote:Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?

    Well, I'd expect cheaters to be banned.

    Where as in game offences are punished with in the game (usually) i.e. a foul = a free kick....not the player being kicked out of the game for cheating.

    Match fixing, going in the refs changing rooms....playing 12 men...sabotaging the pitch on purpose etc.....those are cheating offences imo.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:43 am

    Lux wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?

    Well, I'd expect cheaters to be banned.

    Where as in game offences are punished with in the game (usually) i.e. a foul = a free kick....not the player being kicked out of the game for cheating.

    Match fixing, going in the refs changing rooms....playing 12 men...sabotaging the pitch on purpose etc.....those are cheating offences imo.

    By definition, that's still cheating. Doesn't matter what punishment is deserved. Not all committed fouls are acts of cheating. It has to be intentional to gain an unfair advantage.

    You could also look at it this way: a free kick for fouling is not always gaining an unfair advantage. A free kick is a correct punishment for normal fouls; therefore, the team is not gaining an unfair advantage.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:02 am

    everyone that voted yes is a fucking disgrace.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 am

    SuperManUtd wrote:everyone that voted yes is a fucking disgrace.

    Yes or No. - Page 4 78475
    dena
    dena
     
     


    Posts : 18688
    Age : 35
    Location : only place to find base heads and hot women

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by dena Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:05 am

    ahlycotc wrote:
    Scott wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:
    Lux wrote:
    ayvee1 wrote:It's cheating if it's intentional. Knowingly and willingly breaking the rules for the benefit of you or your team is cheating IMO.

    So every foul with any intent to foul is cheating?

    It's not really how I think of cheating think

    Of course intentionally fouling someone is cheating. You are intentionally breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

    What's your definition of cheating?
    Sleeping with a girl who isn't my current girlfriend.

    You are then intentionally breaking the rules (implied rules of a relationship) to gain an unfair advantage (more pussy while your girlfriend is trying to be loyal towards you).

    Laughing
    ResurrectionRooney
    ResurrectionRooney
     
     


    Posts : 17681
    Supports : United

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by ResurrectionRooney Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:15 am

    SuperManUtd wrote:everyone that voted yes is a fucking disgrace.

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Rightonguysp1
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:23 pm

    Yes, Handballing is technically cheating, but it's not cheating by the rulebooks - It's just a normal foul like any other. That's what I think Lux is trying to say.
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 32
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Lux Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:26 pm

    polska. wrote:Yes, Handballing is technically cheating, but it's not cheating by the rulebooks - It's just a normal foul like any other. That's what I think Lux is trying to say.

    Yup shifty

    Really though, that's the point. In the rules there's no difference between a hand ball in the middle of the field and one right in front of the goal. The difference is the goalscoring opportunity, but even then not all fouls committed when there's a goalscoring opportunity are done with intent, so neither part of hand balling infront of the goal is cheating.

    If you wanted it to be cheating, you'd need to change the rules of the game, otherwise it'd just be typical FIFA punishing on one off occasions in big matches but never following through.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:32 pm

    Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:55 pm

    ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.

    I don't think you understand that that means fuck all when it happens in the box.

    This is how I break it down, quite simple actually:

    Hand + Ball = Handball = Foul = not in box = Free Kick
    Intention + Hand + Ball = Intentional Handball = Foul = not in Box = Yellow Card + Free Kick
    Defensive Team + Hand + Ball = Defensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Red Card + Penalty
    Offensive Team + Hand + Ball = Offensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Yellow Card + Goal Kick
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:58 pm

    It's okay, he's a referee. He's not supposed to know these things. shifty
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 32
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Lux Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:28 pm

    ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.

    The definition of whether something deserves a yellow/red or not isn't "They are cheating or not?"....and almost every foul most likely gives you an unfair advantage.

    You see it based on the intention of the player, but for me fouls are a part of the game....if you regularly play football as a defender you'd understand that Laughing That said, you're a referee so you have the opposite perspective.

    I wouldn't even say diving is cheating. I don't see it as cheating because you're fooling the ref..... I think of it as the players responsibility is to win the game.....and it's the refs responsibility to uphold the rules of the game. The player is doing his best to win the game, it's not his fault the ref is incapable of making the right decision. Sure, it's not honourable but when they're getting paid massive wages and there's so much at stake, I wouldn't expect every player to care.

    The responsibility ultimately lies with FIFA Teeth
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:18 pm

    I could take what you just said and say, "It's okay people murder and steal because they're trying to make as much money and have the best chance of living as possible. It's the police's problem with which to deal and I don't mind their doing it."
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:26 pm

    polska. wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.

    I don't think you understand that that means fuck all when it happens in the box.

    This is how I break it down, quite simple actually:

    Hand + Ball = Handball = Foul = not in box = Free Kick
    Intention + Hand + Ball = Intentional Handball = Foul = not in Box = Yellow Card + Free Kick
    Defensive Team + Hand + Ball = Defensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Red Card + Penalty
    Offensive Team + Hand + Ball = Offensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Yellow Card + Goal Kick

    Too many variables and equations, so let me simplify. First, we will assume that we know what constitutes a handball.

    Any handball committed with intention is punishable with a yellow card. A handball committed (with intention or not) that denies an obvious goal scoring opportunity is punishable by a red card. A handball that is committed without intention or denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity is not punished by any card, just a direct freekick.

    It does not really matter if the handball occurred in the box or not. A red card for handball is given only if it is denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity.

    Lux wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.

    The definition of whether something deserves a yellow/red or not isn't "They are cheating or not?"....and almost every foul most likely gives you an unfair advantage.

    You see it based on the intention of the player, but for me fouls are a part of the game....if you regularly play football as a defender you'd understand that Laughing That said, you're a referee so you have the opposite perspective.

    I wouldn't even say diving is cheating. I don't see it as cheating because you're fooling the ref..... I think of it as the players responsibility is to win the game.....and it's the refs responsibility to uphold the rules of the game. The player is doing his best to win the game, it's not his fault the ref is incapable of making the right decision. Sure, it's not honourable but when they're getting paid massive wages and there's so much at stake, I wouldn't expect every player to care.

    The responsibility ultimately lies with FIFA Teeth

    Like I said earlier, not all fouls are cheating, but all cheating are fouls (if during play). Classing something as cheating is not in the rule book, it's subjective. A lot of fouls are properly punished (i.e. direct freekick, yellow card, red card, etc.). So I understand if you don't agree with me on calling a specific act as cheating.

    If I intentionally stick my hand up to stop a shot on goal from going in, that's cheating imo. But if I intentionally foul someone in the middle of the park to prevent a counterattack (aka tactical foul), that's not really cheating in my book.

    Now it's shocking to hear that you view diving as not cheating. I think it's one of the most agreed upon concepts. Diving should have no place in football. It shouldn't matter how much you get paid or how important the match is, diving is cheating.

    Sure the referee is responsible for enforcing the rules, but referees can and do miss things. It doesn't change the fact that an act is considered cheating. If you murder someone and the judge claims you are not guilty, you are still a murderer by definition.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:27 pm

    SBSP wrote:I could take what you just said and say, "It's okay people murder and steal because they're trying to make as much money and have the best chance of living as possible. It's the police's problem with which to deal and I don't mind their doing it."

    Great minds think alike. Laughing
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:29 pm

    As do ours. shifty
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:33 pm

    Your right, if a handball happens at the edge of the box for example, and is unintentional, it's a yellow card and usually a penalty. (Though i've seen ref's give very close direct free kicks)
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:35 pm

    SBSP wrote:As do ours. shifty

    What? That's what I was referring to. We both took Lux's statement as murdering is OK if you aren't found guilty and get payed a lot of money.
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:39 pm

    ahlycotc wrote:
    SBSP wrote:As do ours. shifty

    What? That's what I was referring to. We both took Lux's statement as murdering is OK if you aren't found guilty and get payed a lot of money.
    You said "Great minds think alike," so I said, "As do ours." Think about it for a second. shifty
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Guest Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:45 pm

    Yes, but by using the phrase "great minds think alike"...you know what, forget it. It's pointless to discuss it. Laughing
    SBSP
    SBSP
     
     


    Posts : 50010

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by SBSP Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:51 pm

    I was implying our minds are not great which you've just proved. Run

    shifty
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 32
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Lux Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:03 pm

    ahlycotc wrote:Like I said earlier, not all fouls are cheating, but all cheating are fouls (if during play). Classing something as cheating is not in the rule book, it's subjective. A lot of fouls are properly punished (i.e. direct freekick, yellow card, red card, etc.). So I understand if you don't agree with me on calling a specific act as cheating.

    If I intentionally stick my hand up to stop a shot on goal from going in, that's cheating imo. But if I intentionally foul someone in the middle of the park to prevent a counterattack (aka tactical foul), that's not really cheating in my book.

    Now it's shocking to hear that you view diving as not cheating. I think it's one of the most agreed upon concepts. Diving should have no place in football. It shouldn't matter how much you get paid or how important the match is, diving is cheating.

    Sure the referee is responsible for enforcing the rules, but referees can and do miss things. It doesn't change the fact that an act is considered cheating. If you murder someone and the judge claims you are not guilty, you are still a murderer by definition.

    Diving....tactical fouls......they're all the same thing. One being more girly than the other isn't going to cloud my judgement......if you want diving out the game, then I'd say it's silly to say that tactical fouls are fine. From my view, tactical fouls are part of the game....I wouldn't say diving is and I don't condone it....but I wouldn't say it's cheating, it's a tactic to fool the ref into giving you an advantage. Is it unfair that the officials/technology etc is not good enough to deal with the tactic? Might as well say that Barcelona are cheating until teams can deal with them Laughing. No but seriously.....I'd say it's more a point of doing things to make diving not worthwhile, i.e. ....make it so that people who dive will not get the decision they want right there, right then...rather than giving them a ban after the game is over......

    SBSP wrote:I could take what you just said and say, "It's okay people murder and steal because they're trying to make as much money and have the best chance of living as possible. It's the police's problem with which to deal and I don't mind their doing it."

    If there was no police force then I would expect people to murder and steal. The fact is....it IS the police's problem to deal with it....that's their job. You might hope people might not do it.....but either you prevent it or you give them a warning, a yellow card jail sentence for a red card execution......and when it comes down to it the police will look to themselves as to how to stop it.

    Not sure it's really related, but it's a bit like the respect campaign. I think it's naive to expect people to respect the refs when they aren't getting the decisions right. FIFA should respect the players/fans/managers by making sure the game is officiated properly....then they'll get the respect they want. Top Hat

    If officials do their jobs properly, then the players will respect them and not dive.
    ResurrectionRooney
    ResurrectionRooney
     
     


    Posts : 17681
    Supports : United

    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by ResurrectionRooney Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:39 pm

    ahlycotc wrote:
    polska. wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:Not all handballs are acts of cheating. It all depends on the player's intention. Are they intentionally handballing to gain an unfair advantage? If yes, then it's cheating. That's why not all handballs are punishable by yellow or red cards.

    I don't think you understand that that means fuck all when it happens in the box.

    This is how I break it down, quite simple actually:

    Hand + Ball = Handball = Foul = not in box = Free Kick
    Intention + Hand + Ball = Intentional Handball = Foul = not in Box = Yellow Card + Free Kick
    Defensive Team + Hand + Ball = Defensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Red Card + Penalty
    Offensive Team + Hand + Ball = Offensive Handball = Foul = in the Box = Yellow Card + Goal Kick

    Too many variables and equations, so let me simplify. First, we will assume that we know what constitutes a handball.

    Any handball committed with intention is punishable with a yellow card. A handball committed (with intention or not) that denies an obvious goal scoring opportunity is punishable by a red card. A handball that is committed without intention or denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity is not punished by any card, just a direct freekick.

    It does not really matter if the handball occurred in the box or not. A red card for handball is given only if it is denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity.

    Ahly, are you actually employed as a referee? Because you're got that badly wrong. Touching the ball with the hand is never a foul unless it is intentional, irrespective of whether it denies a goalscoring opportunity. Handball usually isn't a yellow card unless it constitutes unsporting behaviour. Seriously, go and read the rules again, I'm amazed to read that post from you.

    Sponsored content


    Yes or No. - Page 4 Empty Re: Yes or No.

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:59 am