Goal.com named best football website in Soccerlens Awards

Beyond some outrageous transfer stories (which other papers do) goal.com is actually a decent site.

luke. wrote:

Pablo Sarabia wrote:

luke. wrote:Goal.com is underrated tbh, people slag it for making false reports, and make it seem as if they make all the reports themselves, but tbh the majority are them just passing on information from other sites.

And it is a great football site for finding out interviews etc, due to the timelapse bar.

You're one of those people.

You're actually worse then me you arrogant cunt.

Arrogant? You're the one that tends to call people cunt all the time I was speaking the truth you were talking crap about goal.com the other day when someone posted a link about it.

Arrogant child.

I remember reading that Chelsea were gonna buy Lee from Bolton

having now read other replys to this thread i have come to the conclusion that my above post was unnecessary as it was a reworded regurgitation of other peoples work. although unintentionally.

'orrible bastard wrote:having now read other replys to this thread i have come to the conclusion that my above post was unnecessary as it was a reworded regurgitation of other peoples work. although unintentionally.

Your just like Goal.com!

It's because of Steve

Sean CFC wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:having now read other replys to this thread i have come to the conclusion that my above post was unnecessary as it was a reworded regurgitation of other peoples work. although unintentionally.

Your just like Goal.com!

do i get an award?

if only there was a website where lots of individuals express their opinions, however idiotic and we could get them to all vote for me.......................

........... and the winner of "member of the year 2010" as voted for by contributors of the-playmaker.com goes to *drum roll* ........... 'orrible bastard!

"i'd like to thank the voters of this prestigious award, i feel completely vindicated in my decision to have come here from the now soulless EA Real Football Forum and it just shows how far i have come in the past 6 months. i'd also like to thank my parents especially my mum and dad who have always been there for me since i was seven years old............."

the trophy could look something like this;

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_i2xlyv1yeU4/S1duENPtgoI/AAAAAAAABxg/bB16m3xm65Q/s320/phallic+2.jpg

One day we'll be the best Football website

^^

Goal.com is a good site for finding news tbh.

SkySports and BBC are the only ones I use. Both reliable.

forestfcfan wrote:SkySports and BBC are the only ones I use. Both reliable.

This

forestfcfan wrote:SkySports and BBC are the only ones I use. Both reliable.

It's all the Yanks who use Goal.com.

What about Football365.com?

Pablo Sarabia wrote:

luke. wrote:

Pablo Sarabia wrote:

luke. wrote:Goal.com is underrated tbh, people slag it for making false reports, and make it seem as if they make all the reports themselves, but tbh the majority are them just passing on information from other sites.

And it is a great football site for finding out interviews etc, due to the timelapse bar.

You're one of those people.

You're actually worse then me you arrogant cunt.

Arrogant? You're the one that tends to call people cunt all the time I was speaking the truth you were talking crap about goal.com the other day when someone posted a link about it.

Arrogant child.

Ehh, no I didn't.

And I'm not a child either, shows how sad you are to put me down to that level though.

I don't read much Goal.com as I used to, but their website is not as bad as people make it out to be. Other than their transfer rumors, they are pretty decent. You should read sites like ESPNSoccernet and see some crappy "journalism".

menalawyerguy wrote:بولز تافهين

What? My guess on the second word is "trivial".

ahlycotc wrote:I don't read much Goal.com as I used to, but their website is not as bad as people make it out to be. Other than their transfer rumors, they are pretty decent. You should read sites like ESPNSoccernet and see some crappy "journalism".

menalawyerguy wrote:بولز تافهين

What? My guess on the second word is "trivial".

surely arabic is not conducive to being read on a PC monitor - it looks too intricate!

'orrible bastard wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:I don't read much Goal.com as I used to, but their website is not as bad as people make it out to be. Other than their transfer rumors, they are pretty decent. You should read sites like ESPNSoccernet and see some crappy "journalism".

menalawyerguy wrote:بولز تافهين

What? My guess on the second word is "trivial".

surely arabic is not conducive to being read on a PC monitor - it looks too intricate!

Arabic is intricate to read anywhere, not just on PC monitors. Most written Arabic doesn't contain short vowels in the writing, so you have to really know what you are reading to get the right meaning. A word can be written with the same letters but have 3 different meanings depending on the short vowels.

ahlycotc wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:I don't read much Goal.com as I used to, but their website is not as bad as people make it out to be. Other than their transfer rumors, they are pretty decent. You should read sites like ESPNSoccernet and see some crappy "journalism".

menalawyerguy wrote:بولز تافهين

What? My guess on the second word is "trivial".

surely arabic is not conducive to being read on a PC monitor - it looks too intricate!

Arabic is intricate to read anywhere, not just on PC monitors. Most written Arabic doesn't contain short vowels in the writing, so you have to really know what you are reading to get the right meaning. A word can be written with the same letters but have 3 different meanings depending on the short vowels.

that was my point. and to the untrained eye there are subtle differences in the letters/symbols which make it hard to read in small text?