Everton vs Liverpool || 28 Oct 2012 || 13:30

Hitchy wrote:

Jeff wrote:We've been robbed.

Bullshit

We have for that goal at the end i mean that was a goal i no you outplayed us but that goal should have stood.

Just as the full time whistle went I puked (literally)

AndItsKoren! wrote:

Zzonked wrote:Yeah, if it was an offside decision then that was terrible. We sure it wasn't for a foul in the buildup though?

Linesman flagged, he isn't really in a position to give a foul in a crowded box.

Fair enough, would still be good to see a detailed replay in the studio.

kyro7 wrote:Just as the full time whistle went I puked (literally)

Is that normal for you?

Suarez shouldn't have been on the pitch anyway. 2 red card tackles one in the first, one in the second. Justice done for me.

Everton fans

So was there a foul in the build up to that or what only reason i can see that goal being disallowed no way was anybody offside.

Jeff wrote:Everton fans

So Suarez should have stayed on the pitch?

I know one that you're talking about is the stamp, but it was accidental, what's the other?

Bonked wrote:I know one that you're talking about is the stamp, but it was accidental, what's the other?

Mirallas which injured him and resulted in him getting taken off at half time.

The other, Distin.

Hmm his foul on Distin was pretty bad what else did he do to deserve getting sent off?

What foul on Mirallas?

Jeff wrote:What foul on Mirallas?

30-35 minutes in I think. resulted in his injury.

Bushido wrote:

Bonked wrote:I know one that you're talking about is the stamp, but it was accidental, what's the other?

Mirallas which injured him and resulted in him getting taken off at half time.

The other, Distin.

The Mirallas one was bigger then, I thought he was your biggest threat and you'd probably scored more if he was still on the pitch.

Foul on Mirallas in the first half just outside the box... pretty much just blatantly swept his foot out from under him. Should've definitely been a yellow, didn't think it was red worthy though

Bonked wrote:

Bushido wrote:

Mirallas which injured him and resulted in him getting taken off at half time.

The other, Distin.

The Mirallas one was bigger then, I thought he was your biggest threat and you'd probably scored more if he was still on the pitch.

Yeah Gueye is just a squad player, Oviedo looked a bit more threatening, however.

I was glad Mirallas went off he was a big threat to us and i agree if he had stayed on the pitch you would have prob scored again.

So, does everyone agree that a draw was the fair result?

No Everton played better but i still don't see what was wrong with what should have been the winning goal for us.

Nope, 3-2 Liverpool was a fair result.

Robbed by a fucking twat of a linesman. You can not deny that.

Rodgers face when Suarez did the dive celebration.

I just need to no if there was some type of foul in the build up to that or not.

Jeff wrote:I just need to no if there was some type of foul in the build up to that or not.

Linesmans flag straight out means offside. No foul.

Then it should have been a goal the Everton fans on facebook are saying somebody jumped on somebody or something.

As funny as Suarez's celebration was, Rodgers shouldn't be laughing at it. It's pretty unprofessional from a shit defensive manager.

Jeff wrote:Then it should have been a goal the Everton fans on facebook are saying somebody jumped on somebody or something.

It's facebook, though.

It wasn't even a foul..

Robbed my ass. The cheating prick that scored what would've been the winner should've been sent off earlier anyway

So you agree it should have been a goal?

samiz wrote:It wasn't even a foul..

Things tend to find a way of balancing them self out. (bad edit)