ConorCelticFC wrote:Oh yeah, "The Most Successful Club In World Football" as you like to say... who have never won a European trophy.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:Oh yeah, "The Most Successful Club In World Football" as you like to say... who have never won a European trophy.
Yes we have.
Rangers will forever be immortalized for the glory of the Seventies Intertoto Cup. 
Laurencio wrote:Seems like nothing beats the Premier League for marketing.
Zzonked wrote:Laurencio wrote:Seems like nothing beats the Premier League for marketing.
Germany is doing alright too, Spain seems the worst for a league of their stature.
Zzonked wrote:Stoke City are above Atletico.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:Zzonked wrote:Stoke City are above Atletico.
You believed the list in the first place?
kyro7 wrote:Where's our trophy for this?
Henrik's Tongue wrote:I expected us to be a lot higher up than that to be honest.
ConorCelticFC wrote:Henrik's Tongue wrote:I expected us to be a lot higher up than that to be honest.
Considering our TV deal is probably the lowest and least marketed in the list it's actually an incredible achievement.
Henrik's Tongue wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:
Considering our TV deal is probably the lowest and least marketed in the list it's actually an incredible achievement.
Yeah they included television money .. Take that away and we'd be a lot higher up.
Forest wrote:Stoke and Fulham
There are Championship sides a lot more well known globally than they are
Laurencio wrote:Henrik's Tongue wrote:
Yeah they included television money .. Take that away and we'd be a lot higher up.
Without TV exposure you wouldn't even be on the list, for obvious reasons.
The Bat-Man wrote:Laurencio wrote:
Without TV exposure you wouldn't even be on the list, for obvious reasons.
I think he meant if you take away TV money from everyone and they would be much higher.
Laurencio wrote:The Bat-Man wrote:
I think he meant if you take away TV money from everyone and they would be much higher.
But they wouldn't, they would be much lower. In terms of Brand Value TV money is only good for exposure. Without TV Money there is no international exposure, therefore the brand value would drastically decline for everyone, including Celtic.
Laurencio wrote:The Bat-Man wrote:
I think he meant if you take away TV money from everyone and they would be much higher.
But they wouldn't, they would be much lower. In terms of Brand Value TV money is only good for exposure. Without TV Money there is no international exposure, therefore the brand value would drastically decline for everyone, including Celtic.
The Bat-Man wrote:Laurencio wrote:
But they wouldn't, they would be much lower. In terms of Brand Value TV money is only good for exposure. Without TV Money there is no international exposure, therefore the brand value would drastically decline for everyone, including Celtic.
The thing he's pointing out that Celtic are there with a lot less TV money than anyone else, if EVERYONE had no TV money they would be a lot higher in that table because they don't rely on TV money as much as others.
ConorCelticFC wrote:Laurencio wrote:
But they wouldn't, they would be much lower. In terms of Brand Value TV money is only good for exposure. Without TV Money there is no international exposure, therefore the brand value would drastically decline for everyone, including Celtic.
LOOOOOOL, how can you be so thick? Celtic have far less to lose relative to other teams if you take away TV deals because ours is so shit. How the hell would we be 'much lower' if you took away the TV deals from everyone or ignored it as part of calculating brand value?
Laurencio wrote:The Bat-Man wrote:
The thing he's pointing out that Celtic are there with a lot less TV money than anyone else, if EVERYONE had no TV money they would be a lot higher in that table because they don't rely on TV money as much as others.
I don't get it. Without TV Money the only thing that changes is exposure... with less exposure Celtic's brand would be weakened, not strengthened. I can't see how an overall global decline in brand value due to minimized exposure would help Celtic's rank at all, I might be missing something though.ConorCelticFC wrote:
LOOOOOOL, how can you be so thick? Celtic have far less to lose relative to other teams if you take away TV deals because ours is so shit. How the hell would we be 'much lower' if you took away the TV deals from everyone or ignored it as part of calculating brand value?
You've lost me there.
