Chat Thread

Rick Rosstrich wrote:

crump wrote:

I understand, so I was on the right lines then?

So it essentially just goes to the BBC? Obviously they aren't going to scrap it and have adverts because they make much more money or whatever doing this?

Not very equal, 95% of stations have adverts but the BBC don't. (Am I still on the right lines?)

No. You are way off. A TV license isn't just for the BBC to have no adverts..

Well, it's not my business to know at this age so meh.

Here you go.

Eternal Witcher wrote:

Here you go.

Mate just showed me that.

Neymar with unbelievable tekkers.

Afternoon lads

I can't understand that video but it's got great players so it's a cool video.

Can someone explain to me why I keep getting banned? I think there's been a big misunderstanding.

My Billy Davies account was normal.
Then I asked to be banned, by request.
I then had that account deleted.
I then created a new account, like many other members have, yet mine gets deleted?

This one stays. Period.

Forest wrote:Can someone explain to me why I keep getting banned? I think there's been a big misunderstanding.

My Billy Davies account was normal.
Then I asked to be banned, by request.
I then had that account deleted.
I then created a new account, like many other members have, yet mine gets deleted?

This one stays. Period.

Welcome home bbz

You should be banned for dupes anyway.

Forest wrote:Can someone explain to me why I keep getting banned? I think there's been a big misunderstanding.

My Billy Davies account was normal.
Then I asked to be banned, by request.
I then had that account deleted.
I then created a new account, like many other members have, yet mine gets deleted?

This one stays. Period.

I think the mods hate you.

Thank you Jela


Wrong Kuled. Dupes were created because I've constantly been getting banned without a reason. I wanted each one to be my account, but then they banned it

Forest wrote:Thank you Jela


Wrong Kuled. Dupes were created because I've constantly been getting banned without a reason. I wanted each one to be my account, but then they banned it

Gareth McCleary

Post your video so that we can reminisce.

What do you mean wrong? What about the countless dupes you made when your main account wasn't banned?

Harmless dupes are hardly banworthy. Other members have created dupes, such as Pip.

Uhh yeah they are. You're lucky the mods aren't so consistent.

It's all for the best anyway.

May I ask why you feel duplicate accounts are such a banworthy crime?

Cause it's in the rules you dumb ass

Go on Kuled!

Well, if you wanna play by the rules...


-Bump old threads with meaningless replies


I think most members have broken at least one rule

And I have been warned about doing so.

As have I with the rules I have broken

I'm Cagliari on FIFA and managed to sell Nainggolan for 24m when he's worth 10m. Dumb Lazio.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Rangers Reject a place in the English conferance league:

Spoiler:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:I agree that there are some areas where protectionism is in the UK's best interests, but that doesn't make it morally right. It might be in my interest to mug someone in a dark alley and steal their wallet, I might argue that my responsibility is to look after myself, not John Smith who I just brained.

I believe that as human beings we have a responsibility to each other, a global community. It is ridiculous to divide our loyalties by virtue of chance, we should follow more enlightened ideals such as utilitarianism.

In an ideal Utopia world, sure. But I don't want Britain to be abused as we try and create world peace, harmony and equal rights for everyone whilst every other country looks after itself and it's own interests.

Besides that......these are tough times. We're hardly in a position where we can afford to be doing this shit. We have a massive debt as a country to pay off and I genuinely do not believe that job cutting or using foreign labour just to save money is going to benefit us. When we're in a comfortable position, or if it benefits us, then I'm absolutely happy to help other countries/people. If the cost is worth it then it's fine. Ultimately, is making our own people unemployed worthwhile or justifiable? Who do the UK government answer to....us or Indian people? Unions answer to people who put trust in them, they don't forsake transport workers so that they can help out people who work in other industries.

Lux wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:I agree that there are some areas where protectionism is in the UK's best interests, but that doesn't make it morally right. It might be in my interest to mug someone in a dark alley and steal their wallet, I might argue that my responsibility is to look after myself, not John Smith who I just brained.

I believe that as human beings we have a responsibility to each other, a global community. It is ridiculous to divide our loyalties by virtue of chance, we should follow more enlightened ideals such as utilitarianism.

In an ideal Utopia world, sure. But I don't want Britain to be abused as we try and create world peace, harmony and equal rights for everyone whilst every other country looks after itself and it's own interests.

Besides that......these are tough times. We're hardly in a position where we can afford to be doing this shit. We have a massive debt as a country to pay off and I genuinely do not believe that job cutting or using foreign labour just to save money is going to benefit us. When we're in a comfortable position, or if it benefits us, then I'm absolutely happy to help other countries/people. If the cost is worth it then it's fine. Ultimately, is making our own people unemployed worthwhile or justifiable?

It's absolutely justifiable morally if it gives more people in India jobs and a higher standard of living than it costs the English people, in fact it's morally required. Compared to the average human we are in an extremely comfortable position.

Grant Holt hands in a transfer request.. got too big for his boots.

Cam wrote:Grant Holt hands in a transfer request.. got too big for his boots.

Erm ... Who the fuck better than Norwich is gonna buy him?

Harrold wrote:I'm Cagliari on FIFA and managed to sell Nainggolan for 24m when he's worth 10m. Dumb Lazio.

Damn. And I thought it was good that Sevilla offered double what I payed for Lass.

Wouldn't mind Holt at Saints tbh, would provide good competition for Rickie.