Manchester United FC Official Thread

Danny wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Why? We're level on points with 2 games to go? City are favourites but surely our 8 point lead was more commanding, anything can happen.

They'll have Newcastle next week imo.

What the fuck is this sentence?
"They'll have Newcastle next week in my opinion"
What??

Kuled wrote:

Danny wrote:They'll have Newcastle next week imo.

What the fuck is this sentence?
"They'll have Newcastle next week in my opinion"
What??

As in, they'll beat them, you fucking cunt.

Kuled wrote:

Danny wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Why? We're level on points with 2 games to go? City are favourites but surely our 8 point lead was more commanding, anything can happen.

They'll have Newcastle next week imo.

What the fuck is this sentence?
"They'll have Newcastle next week in my opinion"
What??

They'll have 'em, they'll beat them.

Have = Destroy

kyro7 wrote:1 up front is the right decision, a draw is a good result for us, just a shame Park and Giggs are playing, would have preferred:

Rooney

Nani ------------------- Valencia

Scholes - Carrick

Jones

Evra -- Rio -- Smalling -- Rafael

De Gea

You obvious have never watched United before....

One up front is the wrong choice, Did you watch the game ? once we had two up front we were better.

Should of played the usual line up.

Rooney-Welbeck
Young-scholes-carrick-valencia
evra-ferdinand-smalling-rafael.
de gea

We would have won the game.

Oh, right.

well done fucking players, blow a 4-2 lead with 7mins to go and this is what you get

what a annoying way to lose the title, we were 8 points clear 4 games ago

There's always next season.

We could finish the season on 89 points, and not win the title.

We lost the game by playing Giggs and Park, we usually play 1 striker anyway...

Super, we were better with Welbeck on yes, but that could be down to the fact City were 1-0 up and weren't attacking as much, we still created nothing throughout the 90 minutes, if we didn't concede to a sloppy corner, we kept City out, and that would have been enough.

kyro7 wrote:Super, we were better with Welbeck on yes, but that could be down to the fact City were 1-0 up and weren't attacking as much, we still created nothing throughout the 90 minutes, if we didn't concede to a sloppy corner, we kept City out, and that would have been enough.

I'm going to be a bit of a cunt and say, what the fuck do you mean we were "better". Better than absolutely useless?

Ham. wrote:There's always next season.

That makes it alright then.

Definitely a good thing you lost against Wigan, gave the players a good wake up call.

Laurencio wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Super, we were better with Welbeck on yes, but that could be down to the fact City were 1-0 up and weren't attacking as much, we still created nothing throughout the 90 minutes, if we didn't concede to a sloppy corner, we kept City out, and that would have been enough.

I'm going to be a bit of a cunt and say, what the fuck do you mean we were "better". Better than absolutely useless?

Looked more likely to at least carve something out with Welbeck on. Maybe if we'd started with him, we would have and maybe scored..

Hindsight is fantastic though.

Laurencio wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Super, we were better with Welbeck on yes, but that could be down to the fact City were 1-0 up and weren't attacking as much, we still created nothing throughout the 90 minutes, if we didn't concede to a sloppy corner, we kept City out, and that would have been enough.

I'm going to be a bit of a cunt and say, what the fuck do you mean we were "better". Better than absolutely useless?

We were better in terms of getting more bodies forward, we were still shite but if you look I'm taking that from his post..

Theo Filippo wrote:Definitely a good thing you lost against Wigan, gave the players a good wake up call.

Some people.

Theo Filippo wrote:Definitely a good thing you lost against Wigan, gave the players a good wake up call.

Thanks for reminding me.

Theo Filippo wrote:Definitely a good thing you lost against Wigan, gave the players a good wake up call.

Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

kyro7 wrote:

Laurencio wrote:

I'm going to be a bit of a cunt and say, what the fuck do you mean we were "better". Better than absolutely useless?

We were better in terms of getting more bodies forward, we were still shite but if you look I'm taking that from his post..

I know, I just needed to vent a little

chiboygeorge wrote:Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

To be honest, I don't think Smalling was bad aside from the error that cost us the match.

But to be honest, I'm losing patients with Jones.

Phil Jones going forward makes me sick. It's like he's forgot what he did at the start of the season.

chiboygeorge wrote:Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

add Rooney to that.

chiboygeorge wrote:Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

I think Nani was pretty bad too, didn't really look match fit at all and had several terrible touches. Park was average too, and well I dunno what Jones was playing at...

Danny wrote:Phil Jones going forward makes me sick. It's like he's forgot what he did at the start of the season.

I just don't see why anyone would pick Jones ahead of Rafael. The little Brazilian is a firecracker of a player, yes he can get a little aggressive at times but Jones is equally bad if not worse.

kyro7 wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

To be honest, I don't think Smalling was bad aside from the error that cost us the match.

But to be honest, I'm losing patients with Jones.

That mistake made that line funny.

Andy wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:Jones, Park, Evra, Giggs, Smalling... were so terrible today.

To be honest, I don't think Smalling was bad aside from the error that cost us the match.

But to be honest, I'm losing patients with Jones.

That mistake made that line funny.

jones made some crucial tackles near the end, there were far worse players then him on the pitch

Park simply has to go. End of.