Chelsea FC Official thread

Romeu should of played.

Theo Filippo wrote:Romeu should of played.

He would've been redundant with Norwich playing with 10 men behind the ball. Oddly enough while he'll likely be scrapegoated, Malouda was a positive influence on Chelsea, much better footballer than Lampard at the moment .

Danno wrote:

Theo Filippo wrote:Romeu should of played.

He would've been redundant with Norwich playing with 10 men behind the ball.

No not really, he isn't just a battering ram.

kyro7 wrote:

Sean wrote:

He didnt help us win the game today did he, no, so stop trying to be a smart cunt.

So after one game he's a shit cunt? You can get fucked Sean, if one game you're saying at least he's helping you win games, then a game later he is a shit cunt, based on one game, I'll give you everything you and your shit club deserve.

It could possibly be that it was right after the game and I was perhaps frustrated that Torres missed a chance and so I called him a shit cunt, maybe that could be it, but no take everything literal then. I didnt say anything wrong, I didnt say he was a fucking world beater did I? I said at least he was helping us win games which he was, its not like after one game Im saying ship him out am I?

Sean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:So after one game he's a shit cunt? You can get fucked Sean, if one game you're saying at least he's helping you win games, then a game later he is a shit cunt, based on one game, I'll give you everything you and your shit club deserve.

It could possibly be that it was right after the game and I was perhaps frustrated that Torres missed a chance and so I called him a shit cunt, maybe that could be it, but no take everything literal then. I didnt say anything wrong, I didnt say he was a fucking world beater did I? I said at least he was helping us win games which he was, its not like after one game Im saying ship him out am I?

Oh right, you call him a shit cunt but I should know you don't think that.. cool.

My fault obviously.

It's like you're fully behind him when you win, then when you lose you are against him, fuck that.

I for one think Sean has the righ to call Torres whatever he wants after that miss. Most strikers would have slotted that in with their eyes closed.

Laurencio wrote:I for one think Sean has the righ to call Torres whatever he wants after that miss. Most strikers would have slotted that in with their eyes closed.

I don't give a single fuck what you think.

kyro7 wrote:

Laurencio wrote:I for one think Sean has the righ to call Torres whatever he wants after that miss. Most strikers would have slotted that in with their eyes closed.

I don't give a single fuck what you think.

Well I wrote it anyway

So much anger in this thread 90% of the time

kyro7 wrote:

Sean wrote:

It could possibly be that it was right after the game and I was perhaps frustrated that Torres missed a chance and so I called him a shit cunt, maybe that could be it, but no take everything literal then. I didnt say anything wrong, I didnt say he was a fucking world beater did I? I said at least he was helping us win games which he was, its not like after one game Im saying ship him out am I?

Oh right, you call him a shit cunt but I should know you don't think that.. cool.

My fault obviously.

It's like you're fully behind him when you win, then when you lose you are against him, fuck that.

Find me one time when I've been against Torres when we lose, after the United game I defended him, I've done nothing but defend him since he's been here, I have a fucking right to criticise him if he costs us a win which he did.

That Torres miss wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. He did well to get it into a shooting position, but then had to rush the kick because a defender was about to tackle/block him.

My word.

Scott wrote:That Torres miss wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. He did well to get it into a shooting position, but then had to rush the kick because a defender was about to tackle/block him.

You're being quite lenient on Torres lately

Sean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Oh right, you call him a shit cunt but I should know you don't think that.. cool.

My fault obviously.

It's like you're fully behind him when you win, then when you lose you are against him, fuck that.

Find me one time when I've been against Torres when we lose, after the United game I defended him, I've done nothing but defend him since he's been here, I have a fucking right to criticise him if he costs us a win which he did.

If you call him a shit cunt after showing your support to him one game earlier then I'll be a sarky twat.

Hm, Dunno what to say.

A Striker that scores goals please.

Start. wrote:Hm, Dunno what to say.

A Striker that scores goals please.

So Mceachran looked good when he came on for Swansea

mceachran did good i watch all his minutes he even manage to fit in a laudrup dribble in the last minute on some poor soul from sunderland

Bryan Swanson @skysports_bryan
Just spoken to Shakhtar Donetsk chief. Rejected £16.6m (€20m) bid from Chelsea for Willian.

Shaktar wan't £30m for him, IIRC Lille only want £30m for Hazard who is a much better player. Hazard is a lot more consistent in his performances and is also a lot younger.

Willian is nothing special as I said, would be better off looking in Brazil for players like him, hope Chelsea get him though, Wenger doesn't seem to be intersted in Hazard, hope he goes to Real (as if they needed him), don't want him in the Prem.

Gegilworld93 wrote:Willian is nothing special as I said, would be better off looking in Brazil for players like him, hope Chelsea get him though, Wenger doesn't seem to be intersted in Hazard, hope he goes to Real (as if they needed him), don't want him in the Prem.

Why wouldn't you not want a wonderful talent such as Hazard in the premiership?

Laurencio wrote:

Gegilworld93 wrote:Willian is nothing special as I said, would be better off looking in Brazil for players like him, hope Chelsea get him though, Wenger doesn't seem to be intersted in Hazard, hope he goes to Real (as if they needed him), don't want him in the Prem.

Why wouldn't you not want a wonderful talent such as Hazard in the premiership?

Because he wouldn't be playing for Arsenal.

Laurencio wrote:

Gegilworld93 wrote:Willian is nothing special as I said, would be better off looking in Brazil for players like him, hope Chelsea get him though, Wenger doesn't seem to be intersted in Hazard, hope he goes to Real (as if they needed him), don't want him in the Prem.

Why wouldn't you not want a wonderful talent such as Hazard in the premiership?

It will harm Arsenal's chances of being the No. 2 team in London.

Laurencio wrote:

Gegilworld93 wrote:Willian is nothing special as I said, would be better off looking in Brazil for players like him, hope Chelsea get him though, Wenger doesn't seem to be intersted in Hazard, hope he goes to Real (as if they needed him), don't want him in the Prem.

Why wouldn't you not want a wonderful talent such as Hazard in the premiership?

What Start said, would love him to play for us but not against us .

Start. wrote:Hm, Dunno what to say.

A Striker that scores goals please.

Stay away from Suarez.

Cadbury wrote:

Start. wrote:Hm, Dunno what to say.

A Striker that scores goals please.

Stay away from Suarez.

he said "striker that SCORES GOALS"

you have nothing to worry about

ViVaRooney wrote:

Cadbury wrote:

Stay away from Suarez.

he said "striker that SCORES GOALS"

you have nothing to worry about

That's the joke you bellend.

Feruz ripping shit up in Reserves game.

Cadbury wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:

he said "striker that SCORES GOALS"

you have nothing to worry about

That's the joke you bellend.

i serousely dowt u was joking