Hangover Part III

    Share
    avatar
    Mal
     
     

    Posts : 31043
    Age : 27

    Hangover Part III

    Post by Mal on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:13 pm

    Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures are reteaming with Todd Phillips for “The Hangover Part III,” the third installment in the record-breaking comedy franchise, which is slated for release on May 24, 2013. The announcement was made today by Jeff Robinov, President Warner Bros. Pictures Group.

    “The Hangover Part III” will star Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis, who will reprise the roles of Phil, Stu and Alan, collectively known to moviegoers as “the Wolfpack.” In the previous two films, the three friends’ attempts to plan a celebration have resulted in disaster for them, but led to a combined billion-dollar success at the worldwide box office.

    In making the announcement, Robinov stated, “We are extremely pleased to have Todd Phillips and the guys back together again for another ‘Hangover,’ and we look forward to collaborating with them on another great movie.”

    Phillips said, “I’m so excited to embark on another ‘Hangover’ film with Bradley, Ed and Zach. We’re going to surprise a lot of people with the final chapter we have planned. It will be a fitting conclusion to our three-part opera of mayhem, despair and bad decisions.”

    Phillips is writing the screenplay with Craig Mazin, who also collaborated with him on the screenplay for “The Hangover Part II.” Phillips is again producing the film under his Green Hat Films banner, together with Dan Goldberg. Thomas Tull and Scott Budnick will serve as executive producers.

    Production on the film is projected to begin in September 2012.

    A presentation of Warner Bros. Pictures, in association with Legendary Pictures, “The Hangover Part III” will be distributed worldwide by Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company.

    Neutral


    _________________
    --


    Chu-Young Park's EPL career with Arsenal: 6 minutes, 4 touches of the ball. Gone but never forgotten.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:31 pm

    Oh dear... They should have just stopped after the first one instead of boring us with remakes set in different locations. I hope I'm wrong but I'm quite certain that a third one will just be as lazy and unoriginal as the second one.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:33 pm

    Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?

    I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
    avatar
    Zzonked
     
     

    Posts : 24277
    Age : 25

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Zzonked on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:47 pm

    Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?

    I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular

    The second one wasn't great though.

    It needs something more original in the third, rather than just a remake in a different location.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:50 pm

    1st was great. Should have left it at that.

    People always feel the need to run a series into the ground.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:34 pm

    They said the third one would be different from the first two.
    avatar
    Lux
     
     

    Posts : 9892
    Age : 25
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Lux on Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:00 pm

    1st was great. 2nd was pretty boring....3rd?....Neutral
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:31 pm

    Second was boring because we've already seen the first one.

    I am sure for someone who never saw the first one and only the second one, the second one was hilarious.

    Barton
     
     

    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 23

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Barton on Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:35 pm

    Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?

    I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular

    Go ahead, i'm not paying money to see another embarrassingly lazy sequal.
    avatar
    CollieBuddz
     
     

    Posts : 3473
    Age : 27

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by CollieBuddz on Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:09 am

    I watched the first one and wasn't impressed at all. Didn't bother with the second.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:46 am

    Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?

    I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular

    No. The second one was utter shit.
    avatar
    dena
     
     

    Posts : 18688
    Age : 28
    Location : only place to find base heads and hot women

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by dena on Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:57 am

    The second one was an EXACT copy of the 1st with changes in location and sidekick (from a baby to a monkey) everything else was the same, no way I'm going to the theater for this one.
    avatar
    Mouse
     
     

    Posts : 17009
    Age : 21
    Location : Cymru
    Supports : Sweden Women's National Handball Team

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Mouse on Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:23 am

    facepalm
    avatar
    Start.
     
     

    Posts : 5268
    Supports : Chelsea FC.

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Start. on Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:35 am

    The second one isn't as bad as people make out, I've watched worse. Laughing

    avatar
    Danny
     
     

    Posts : 55218
    Age : 23
    Location : Burscough

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Danny on Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:50 am

    I watched the second one before the first, lulz.

    avatar
    VivaRonaldoLAD
     
     

    Posts : 14745
    Location : United Road.
    Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by VivaRonaldoLAD on Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:31 am

    Its gonna be in Dublin.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Guest on Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:45 am

    They have gone to far with it now. I won't be as funny if they keep the same formular as the last two.
    avatar
    MickStupp
     
     

    Posts : 1933
    Age : 25
    Location : Glasgow

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by MickStupp on Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:47 am

    Sarmz wrote:They said the third one would be different from the first two.
    I heard this too. Can't remember where though.
    avatar
    Mal
     
     

    Posts : 31043
    Age : 27

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Mal on Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:04 am

    MickStupp wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:They said the third one would be different from the first two.
    I heard this too. Can't remember where though.

    Bradley Cooper said it on various chat shows.


    _________________
    --


    Chu-Young Park's EPL career with Arsenal: 6 minutes, 4 touches of the ball. Gone but never forgotten.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Hangover Part III

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:25 pm