Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures are reteaming with Todd Phillips for “The Hangover Part III,” the third installment in the record-breaking comedy franchise, which is slated for release on May 24, 2013. The announcement was made today by Jeff Robinov, President Warner Bros. Pictures Group.
“The Hangover Part III” will star Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis, who will reprise the roles of Phil, Stu and Alan, collectively known to moviegoers as “the Wolfpack.” In the previous two films, the three friends’ attempts to plan a celebration have resulted in disaster for them, but led to a combined billion-dollar success at the worldwide box office.
In making the announcement, Robinov stated, “We are extremely pleased to have Todd Phillips and the guys back together again for another ‘Hangover,’ and we look forward to collaborating with them on another great movie.”
Phillips said, “I’m so excited to embark on another ‘Hangover’ film with Bradley, Ed and Zach. We’re going to surprise a lot of people with the final chapter we have planned. It will be a fitting conclusion to our three-part opera of mayhem, despair and bad decisions.”
Phillips is writing the screenplay with Craig Mazin, who also collaborated with him on the screenplay for “The Hangover Part II.” Phillips is again producing the film under his Green Hat Films banner, together with Dan Goldberg. Thomas Tull and Scott Budnick will serve as executive producers.
Production on the film is projected to begin in September 2012.
A presentation of Warner Bros. Pictures, in association with Legendary Pictures, “The Hangover Part III” will be distributed worldwide by Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company.
+7
Mouse
dena
CollieBuddz
Barton
Lux
Zzonked
Mal
11 posters
Hangover Part III
Mal-
- Posts : 31043
Age : 33
- Post n°1
Hangover Part III
Guest- Guest
- Post n°2
Re: Hangover Part III
Oh dear... They should have just stopped after the first one instead of boring us with remakes set in different locations. I hope I'm wrong but I'm quite certain that a third one will just be as lazy and unoriginal as the second one.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°3
Re: Hangover Part III
Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?
I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
Zzonked-
- Posts : 24290
Age : 32
- Post n°4
Re: Hangover Part III
Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?
I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
The second one wasn't great though.
It needs something more original in the third, rather than just a remake in a different location.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°5
Re: Hangover Part III
1st was great. Should have left it at that.
People always feel the need to run a series into the ground.
People always feel the need to run a series into the ground.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°6
Re: Hangover Part III
They said the third one would be different from the first two.
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 31
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
- Post n°7
Re: Hangover Part III
1st was great. 2nd was pretty boring....3rd?....
Guest- Guest
- Post n°8
Re: Hangover Part III
Second was boring because we've already seen the first one.
I am sure for someone who never saw the first one and only the second one, the second one was hilarious.
I am sure for someone who never saw the first one and only the second one, the second one was hilarious.
Barton-
- Formerly known as : JMB_94
Posts : 10066
Age : 29
- Post n°9
Re: Hangover Part III
Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?
I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
Go ahead, i'm not paying money to see another embarrassingly lazy sequal.
CollieBuddz-
- Posts : 3473
Age : 33
- Post n°10
Re: Hangover Part III
I watched the first one and wasn't impressed at all. Didn't bother with the second.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°11
Re: Hangover Part III
Billy Davies wrote:Why would they stop making them if they bring in loads of money?
I'll go and watch it. It is becoming one of those films where people feel the need to criticise it just because it's popular
No. The second one was utter shit.
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 34
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
- Post n°12
Re: Hangover Part III
The second one was an EXACT copy of the 1st with changes in location and sidekick (from a baby to a monkey) everything else was the same, no way I'm going to the theater for this one.
Mouse-
- Posts : 17009
Age : 28
Location : Cymru
Supports : Sweden Women's National Handball Team
- Post n°13
Re: Hangover Part III
Start.-
- Posts : 5268
Supports : Chelsea FC.
- Post n°14
Re: Hangover Part III
The second one isn't as bad as people make out, I've watched worse.
Danny-
- Posts : 55218
Age : 29
Location : Burscough
- Post n°15
Re: Hangover Part III
I watched the second one before the first, lulz.
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°16
Re: Hangover Part III
Its gonna be in Dublin.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°17
Re: Hangover Part III
They have gone to far with it now. I won't be as funny if they keep the same formular as the last two.
MickStupp-
- Posts : 1933
Age : 32
Location : Glasgow
- Post n°18
Re: Hangover Part III
I heard this too. Can't remember where though.Sarmz wrote:They said the third one would be different from the first two.
Mal-
- Posts : 31043
Age : 33
- Post n°19
Re: Hangover Part III
MickStupp wrote:I heard this too. Can't remember where though.Sarmz wrote:They said the third one would be different from the first two.
Bradley Cooper said it on various chat shows.
|
|